Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001245.pub2

Tsementzis 1990.

Methods Single‐centre study
 Random allocation (identical sequentially numbered medication boxes)
 Double‐blind treatment
 Not strictly ITT: 4 participants excluded after randomisation who missed a few doses medication
Participants Clinical diagnosis of aneurysmal SAH verified on CT or in the CSF
 Male:female: treatment group 20:30; placebo group 26:24
 Age distribution similar in both groups
 Excluded: SAH > 72 hours, antihypertensives or medication known to affect the fibrinolytic or coagulation systems, acute myocardial infarction, coagulation disorders or thrombotic disease, renal failure, pregnancy, previous tranexamic acid‐treatment or people in whom death seemed imminent
Interventions Tranexamic acid (9 g per day, iv in 6 doses in week 1, orally in 4 doses in week 2, 3 and 4) versus identical‐appearing placebo treatment for a maximum treatment duration of 4 weeks#
Treatment was discontinued if an operation for the aneurysm began or if deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary infarction developed
Outcomes Outcome: Glasgow Outcome Scale at discharge, 1, 3 and 6 months
 Events: rebleeding: reported and defined ‐ 'clinical signs confirmed on CT, in the CSF or at necropsy'; ischaemia: reported and defined ‐ 'clinical signs combined with the absence of evidence of rebleeding on CT or CSF'; hydrocephalus: reported, not defined
Notes No report of how many participants' rebleedings or cerebral ischaemia were established on CT scan or at necropsy
 No definition on hydrocephalus other then 'ventricular dilatation was seen on angiography'
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Placebo controlled trial with sequentially numbered boxes with trial medication was used
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Boxes with either tranexamic acid or placebo were used that were numbered consecutively by the pharmacist
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Not reported in the text, but because of control with placebo, not thought to have influenced results
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 4 participants were excluded and no mention is made on their outcome
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not reported in the text
Other bias Unclear risk 20 participants with protocol violations were excluded from the analysis after randomisation