Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001245.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Adams 1981 Comparative trial between antifibrinolytic agents and blood pressure reduction or fluid restriction
Ameen 1981 Not a randomised trial; historic control group used
Brzecki 1974 All participants received epsikapron, while being randomised between trasylol or placebo; also historical control group
Buchner 1985 Not a randomised trial; historical control group
Chowdhary 1979 Not strictly randomised; allocation to treatment or placebo according to days of the week
Chowdhary 1981 Comparative trial between tranexamic acid and EACA
Chowdhary 1986 No clinical outcome reported, only data on rebleeding and cerebral ischaemia
Fodstad 1978 No ITT analysis possible; too many participants (14 of a of total 60 randomised) excluded from final analysis after randomisation
Gelmers 1980 Not strictly randomised; allocation to treatment or placebo according to days of the week
Gibbs 1971 Not a randomised trial; significant treatment differences, for instance concerning the timing of surgery, between the EACA‐treated participants and the control group
Kassell 1984 Not a randomised trial; case‐control study
Knuckey 1982 Not a randomised trial; case‐control study
Marchel 1992 Not a randomised trial; historic control group used
Nibbelink 1975 Not a randomised trial, no control group
Profeta 1975 Not a randomised trial; historic control group used
Rosenorn 1988 Not a randomised trial; case‐control study
Salaschek 1983 Not a randomised trial; historical control group
Sengupta 1976 Not a randomised trial; physicians preferred allocation
Shucart 1980 Not a randomised trial; physicians preferred allocation
Starke 2008 Not a randomised trial; case control study
Wijdicks 1989 Not a randomised trial; case‐control study with historical control group

EACA: epsilon amino‐caproic acid
 ITT: intention‐to‐treat