Roddy 2020.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: multicentre, parallel‐arm, open‐label randomised controlled trial Setting: 100 GP practices across England Time period: 29 January 2014 to 31 December 2015 Intervention: naproxen (NSAID) 750 mg immediately then 250 mg every 8 hours for 7 days, or low‐dose colchicine 500 mcg three times per day for 4 days. Sample size: a sample size of 200 participants per arm was required to detect a small standardised effect size of 0.3 for the primary outcome of change in pain intensity from baseline measured over the first 7 days, allowing for the repeated measures structure (assumed autocorrelation 0.6), 20% loss to follow‐up, 1:1 allocation ratio, 90% power and two‐sided type 1 error of 0.05. This trial aimed to assess the superiority of naproxen or colchicine (two‐tailed hypothesis testing). Analysis: ITT |
|
Participants |
Number of participants
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Baseline characteristics Colchicine group (n=199)
Naproxen group (n=200)
Pretreatment group differences: none |
|
Interventions |
Low‐dose colchicine group
Control (naproxen group)
Co‐intervention
|
|
Outcomes | Outcomes were measured at days 0 to 7 and week 4 Primary outcome
Mean change from baseline was compared between groups over days 1 to 7. Secondary outcomes
Outcome measures were collected by self‐completed daily diary (days 1–7) and a questionnaire at week 4. Outcomes used in this review
Time pointsused in this review
|
|
Source of funding | This trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR). | |
Notes |
Trial registration: this trial was prospectively registered at ISRCTN (identifier: 69836939) on 21 November 2013 and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01994226) on 25 November 2013. The total number of participants in each treatment arm (colchicine = 199, NSAIDs = 200) was less than sample size calculated a priori for an adequately powered study (200 per arm), allowing for a 20% loss to follow‐up. Competing interests: the authors declared no competing interests for this trial. Withdrawals: 6/199 (3%) in the colchicine group and 10/200 (5%) in the naproxen group. No reasons for withdrawal given. Total number of participants reporting adverse events*
*The corresponding author was contacted via email requesting unpublished data for number of participants who experienced "any side effects" over the 4‐week follow‐up period in this trial. These data (the number of participants who reported "any side effect") were provided and are reported as total adverse events. The type of adverse events that participants reported include nausea and/or vomiting, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, headache, constipation, diarrhoea, skin rash and "other" (free nominated text). Serious adverse events
None of the three serious adverse events outlined above were related to study interventions, and there were no deaths. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to naproxen or low‐dose colchicine groups using simple randomisation, which was undertaken by a healthcare professional using web access to a secure remote allocation system or, if this could not be accessed, a telephone randomisation service. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Clinicians and participants did not know which treatment a participant would receive prior to randomisation, ensuring allocation concealment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | The GP prescribed the allocated medication. Participants and treating clinicians were aware of treatment allocation. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Self‐reported outcomes (pain, treatment success, reduction of inflammation, function, serious adverse events, total adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events) | High risk | This trial had an open‐label design without blinded outcome assessment or placebo. Baseline data were collected by self‐complete questionnaire prior to randomisation. Outcome measures were collected by self‐completed daily diary (days 1–7) and a questionnaire at week 4. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Assessor‐reported outcomes (reduction of inflammation, function) | Low risk | No assessor reported outcomes were measured in this trial. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 399 eligible participants were randomised into naproxen group (n = 200), and low‐dose colchicine group (n = 199). ITT was used for the main analysis, evaluating participants as per allocation assignment. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | This trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01994226) and ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN69836939). The registered primary and secondary outcomes in the ISRCTN registry match the collected outcomes data of the trial, except for the secondary outcomes time‐to‐treatment effect and complete pain resolution, which were added to the trial using data that was collected for other outcome measures. All measured outcomes from baseline to week 4 follow‐up reported descriptive statistics (mean, SD and number of participants) for continuous outcomes, and the number of events and number of participants for dichotomous outcomes. Days to complete pain resolution and number of days taken off work because of gout during 4‐week follow‐up were reported as median (IQR). |
Other bias | Low risk | No other potential bias detected. |