Terkeltaub 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: double‐blind, three‐arm parallel placebo controlled, randomised trial Setting: multicentre (54 centres in the USA) Time period: between April 2007 and October 2008 Intervention: low‐dose colchicine (1.2 mg followed by 0.6 mg in 1 hour followed by placebo doses every hour for 5 hours) versus high‐dose colchicine (1.2 mg followed by 0.6 mg every hour for 6 hours) versus placebo (2 placebo capsules initially, followed by 1 placebo capsule every hour for 6 hours) Sample size: not described Analysis: ITT analysis planned |
|
Participants |
Number of participants
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Baseline characteristics (provided by 185 participants with a gout flare only) High‐dose colchicine group (n = 52)
Low‐dose colchicine group (n = 74)
Placebo group (n = 59)
Groups were similar at baseline. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention group 1 (low‐dose colchicine)
Intervention group 2 (high‐dose colchicine)
Control group (placebo)
Co‐intervention
|
|
Outcomes | Outcomes recorded by participants at prespecified time points for pain using a standardised diary: pain was recorded at baseline, hourly for the first 8 hours and every 8 hours thereafter (while awake) until 72 hours following the initial dose or symptom resolution; recording at 24 hours mandatory. Study physicians at each site assessed participants within 48 hours after onset of symptoms and up to 3 more visits, the last being 7 days after flare onset (they reviewed the participant diaries and recorded pertinent data on standardised case report forms). Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
Outcomes used in this review
Time points used in this review
|
|
Source of funding | The trial was sponsored by URL Pharma. The Chief Medical Officer for URL Pharma had key roles in the study design data collection, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. Prior to the start of the trial, URL Pharma agreed that the authors had full rights to submit the manuscript for publication; URL Pharma approval of the content of the submitted manuscript was not required, and publication of the manuscript was not contingent upon the approval of URL Pharma. | |
Notes |
Trial registration: this trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00506883) on 23 July 2007. Withdrawals: 1 participant in the placebo group withdrew without recording any data ("non‐responder") and was not included in the ITT analysis. The number of participants in each group included as the "safety population" was not equal due to the method of inclusion in the trial (many participants were randomised but only those who had a gout flare were included). Only a responder analysis was presented ‐ mean (SD) pain scores at each time point were not presented. Competing interests: "Dr. Terkeltaub has received consulting fees from Altus, Ardea, BioCryst, Novartis, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Regeneron, Savient, EnzymeRx, Takeda, URL Pharma, and UCB (less than $10,000 each) and has received Research Service grants from the VA (more than $10,000). Dr. Furst has received consulting fees from Abbott, Actelion, Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Biogen Idec, Centocor, Gilead, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Nitec, Novartis, UCB, Wyeth, and Xoma (less than $10,000 each), speaking fees from Abbott, Actelion, and UCB (less than $10,000 each), and honoraria from Abbott, Actelion, Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Biogen Idec, Centocor, Genentech, Gilead, Merck, and Nitec (less than $10,000 each); he has received grants from Abbott, Actelion, Amgen, Bristol‐ Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, the NIH, Nitec, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Wyeth, and Xoma. Salamandra, LLC (employer of Drs. Bennett and Kook) is a regulatory and clinical consulting firm contracted by URL Pharma. D.A.T.A. Inc. (employer of Dr. Crockett) is a contract statistics company retained by United Bio‐ source (a contract research organization) to provide statistical services for this clinical trial. Dr. Davis owns stock options in URL Pharma, and he holds 2 patents pertaining to the dosing of colchicine with clarithromycin." Total adverse events
Serious adverse events
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomisation is not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | At the randomisation visit the investigator dispensed a blister card containing 8 identical‐looking capsules (in a combination of active drug and placebo capsules) for use during their next gout flare. Quote: "over encapsulated (to preserve double‐blindedness) colchicine and matching over encapsulated placebo were provided" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Both participants and study personnel were blinded to treatment |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Self‐reported outcomes (pain, treatment success, reduction of inflammation, function, serious adverse events, total adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events) | Low risk | The participant assessed pain, symptoms, adverse events and rescue medication by using a standardised diary; and were unaware of treatment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Assessor‐reported outcomes (reduction of inflammation, function) | Low risk | The study physicians at each site were blinded to treatment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 7/52 (13.5%) in the high‐dose colchicine group, 3/74 (4%) in the low‐dose colchicine group and 4/59 (6.8%) in the placebo group did not complete full follow‐up, either because of lack of benefit, loss to follow‐up or for other unclear reasons (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00506883 on 23 July 2007) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | This trial was registered 23 July 2007 but recruitment began in April 2007 and final data collection occurred in October 2007. For benefit only a responders analysis was presented. The mean (SD) pain scores were not presented. The methods also state that symptoms were collected but this is not reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Site of flare and number of joints affected were not presented. If baseline differences existed this may have affected the results. The numbers of participants by group treated at each site was not specified but it is stated that some sites did not have participants in all treatment groups. While the number of randomised participants in each group was approximately equal, the numbers of participants in each group who had an acute flare of gout and therefore had outcome data available was not equal. |