Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 21;2003(3):CD004110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004110

2. Methodological Quality (M‐Z).

Study Randomisation Blinding of Assessor Baseline Withdrawals Missing Values Attrition Analysis Power Eligibility
Matheny (1978) B B A B B B B B A
Mulac (1977) B A B B B B B B B
Munro (1999) B A B A C C (.15) B B A
Reid (1996) B B C (medians) A (subgroup) A (subgroup) A (subgroup) B B A
Robertson (1997) B C A B B B B B A
Robertson (1999) B B A A C C (.13) B B A
Ruscello (1993) B B A B B B B B A
Rvachew (1994) B A A B C C (.13) B B A
Rvachew (2001) B A A A B B B B A
Schwartz (1985) B C B B B B B B A
Shelton (1978) B B A A C A (.08) B B A
Sommers (1962) B B A B B B B B B
Sommers (1964) B B B B B B B B B
Sommers (1966) B A B C C C (.10) B B B
Sutton (1999) B B B B B B B B A
Tufts (1959) B A A B B B B B B
Wilcox (1991) B B A B B B B B A
Key A: methods of randomisation explained A: assessors blind to group allocation at pre and post test A: baseline characteristics reported A: withdrawals accounted for A: missing values taken into account in analysis A: <.10 attrition A: intention to treat analysis used A: power calculation completed and sufficient participants recruited A: characteristics in main linguistic areas
  B: methods fo randomisation not explained B: blinding not reported B: baseline characteristics not reported B: withdrawals not reported B: no missing values shown B: attrition not reported B: intention to treat analysis not reported B: power claculation not reported B: characteristics in main area of study
  C: methods of randomisation inadequate C: assessors blind at pre‐test only C: baseline characteristics reported to be different C: withdrawals not accounted for C: missing values discounted in analysis C: >.10 attrition   C: power calculation completed but insufficient participants recruited C: characteristics unclear