Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 21;2003(3):CD004110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004110

Rvachew 1994.

Methods Randomised Controlled Trial
Participants 27 participants aged 3;06 ‐ 5;06
 21 males and 6 females participated, no SES characteristics are provided
Interventions Clinician administered phonological therapy with additional auditory discrimination task. Therapy delivered for 45 minutes a week over 6 weeks.
 Experimental group had to identify correct and incorrect pronunciations of the same word
 Traditional group had to discriminate between a minimal pair
 The third group had to discriminate between a non minimal pair of words
 10 children received an experimental auditory discrimination task
 9 children received a traditional auditory discrimination task
 8 children received a discrimination game not based on minimal pairs
Outcomes Auditory word discrimination test
 Object naming speech sample
 Outcomes excluded: /sh/ centroid
Notes The criteria stated that children had to be non‐stimulable to /sh/ however all but two children also had moderate or severe phonological delay as shown by CAPP
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear