Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;2021(7):CD011301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011301.pub2

Comparison 6. OnabotulinumtoxinA 64units versus OnabotulinumoxinA 40U one cycle of treatment, upper wrinkles.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
6.1 Participant assessment of success by analysing scores and scales 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.1 4 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.2 8 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.3 12 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.4 16 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.5 20 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.6 24 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.2 Any major adverse events (eyelid ptosis, eyelid sensory disorder, strabismus) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3 Physician assessment of success by analysing scores and scales 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3.1 4 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3.2 8 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3.3 12 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3.4 16 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3.5 20 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3.6 24 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.4 Total adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected