Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;2021(7):CD011301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011301.pub2

Comparison 61. NewBontA [Neuronox®] 20 units versus OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 units one treatment in crow’s feet lines.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
61.1 Participant assessment of success by analysing scores and scales 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
61.1.1 4 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.89, 1.15]
61.1.2 8 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.83, 1.03]
61.1.3 12 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.90, 1.16]
61.1.4 16 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.70, 1.01]
61.2 Any major adverse events (eyelid ptosis, eyelid sensory disorder, strabismus) 1   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
61.3 Physician assessment of success by analysing scores and scales 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
61.3.1 4 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.89, 1.13]
61.3.2 8 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.86, 1.11]
61.3.3 12 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.88, 1.32]
61.3.4 16 weeks 1 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.83, 1.56]
61.4 Total adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
61.4.1 Total adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected