Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;2021(7):CD011301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011301.pub2

Comparison 64. CBFC26 20 units versus OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 units one treatment in glabellar lines.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
64.1 Participant assessment of success by analysing scores and scales 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.1.1 4 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.1.2 8 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.1.3 12 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.1.4 16 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.2 Any major adverse events (eyelid ptosis, eyelid sensory disorder, strabismus) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.3 Physician assessment of success by analysing scores and scales 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.3.1 4 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.3.2 8 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.3.3 12 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.3.4 16 weeks 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
64.4 Total adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected