Crawford 2013 (CS37).
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: parallel‐group randomized controlled clinical trial
Study dates: 2009 to 2012 Setting: multicenter, outpatients, national Country: United States Official title: a randomized, controlled, open‐label study investigating the safety and efficacy of degarelix given intermittently vs continuous androgen deprivation therapy with Lupron or degarelix in patients with prostate cancer with prior treatment failure after localized treatment Follow‐up: 14 months |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Sample size: 409 (randomized)/403 (treated) Stage of disease: unclear |
|
Interventions | Group 1 (Degarelix Intermittent) (n = 175): Phase A: degarelix 240/80 mg; Phase B: degarelix paused; men in this arm received degarelix with a starting dose of 240 mg at a concentration of 40 mg/mL on Day 0 administered s.c. into the anterior abdominal wall via 2 equivalent injections of 120 mg (3 mL) each. 6 maintenance doses of degarelix 80 mg per month at a concentration of 20 mg/mL (4 mL) at Days 28 to 168 were administered. During Phase B of the trial, if a participant had PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL at any visit, additional doses of degarelix 240 mg followed by 80 mg maintenance dose(s) were administered. Degarelix treatment provided for first 7 months (1 starting dose and 6 maintenance doses) followed by no treatment for next 7‐month period. Group 2 (Degarelix Continuous) (n = 50): degarelix 240/80 mg; men in this arm received degarelix with a starting dose of 240 mg at a concentration of 40 mg/mL administered on Day 0 (Visit 1) s.c. into the anterior abdominal wall via 2 equivalent injections of 120 mg (3 mL) each. 13 maintenance doses of degarelix 80 mg per month at a concentration of 20 mg/mL (4 mL) at Days 28 to 364 administered s.c. into the anterior abdominal wall. Degarelix treatment provided for complete study period (1 starting dose and 13 maintenance doses). Group 3 (Leuprolide Continuous) (n = 178): leuprolide 7.5/22.5 mg; men in this arm received leuprolide 7.5 mg 1‐month depot injection on Day 0, administered i.m. into a large muscle, as per manufacturer's labeling directions. 1 injection of 22.5 mg leuprolide 3‐month depot was administered i.m. as per manufacturer's labeling directions at Day 28 and every 3 months afterwards for 4 additional doses (i.e. at Days 112, 196, 280, and 364, respectively). On Investigator's discretion, men in the arm could take bicalutamide (Casodex) for a maximum of 28 days to alleviate increased signs and symptoms due to initial upsurge in testosterone levels. Leuprolide treatment for complete study period (1 starting dose and 5 maintenance doses of 3‐month depot each) |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Funding sources | Ferring Pharmaceuticals | |
Declarations of interest | None reported; clinical development support Ferring Pharmaceuticals. | |
Notes | No full‐text publication available. We did not include data for the degarelix intermittent arm as this information was not relevant to this review. Trial ID: NCT00928434 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk |
Quote from publication: “men were randomized” Comment: insufficient information to permit judgment. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk |
Quote from publication: “men were randomized” Comment: insufficient information to permit judgment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk |
Quote from ClinicalTrials.gov: “This was an open‐label, randomized, parallel‐arm, multicenter study” Comment: we judge that subjective outcomes are influenced by lack of blinding. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | Unclear risk |
Quote from publication: “open‐label trial”; there was no blinding of outcome assessment (or it was not reported) Comment: insufficient information to permit judgment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Biochemical progression | Unclear risk | Comment: the study did not address this outcome. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Adverse events | Low risk | Comment: no missing outcome data. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Quality of life | Low risk | Comment: missing outcome data balanced in numbers across intervention groups (Group 2 18.0% vs Group 3 15.7%). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: the study protocol is available, but we did not identify full‐text publications. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: we did not identify other sources of bias. |