Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 11;2021(8):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub4

3. Age and sex of participants.

EVLA versus RFA
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
EVLA RFA EVLA RFA
Nordon 2011 46.7 (14.4)
mean (SD)
46.9 (15.1)
mean (SD)
54:26 45:34
Rasmussen 2011 52 (18 ‐ 74)
mean (range)
51 (23 ‐ 75)
mean (range)
90:35 88:37
Recovery 2009 51.6 (12.8)
mean (SD)
52.4 (15.3)
mean (SD)
31:10 29:17
Shepherd 2010 48 (16)
mean (SD)
49 (15)
mean (SD)
42:22 47:20
Syndor 2017 48.5 (23 ‐ 86)
mean (range)
47 (19 ‐ 86)
mean (range)
77:23 80:20
EVLA versus EVSA
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA
LAST 2014 55 (12)
mean (SD)
56 (13)
mean (SD)
61:45
62:48 (legs)
73:39
76:41 (legs)
EVLA versus UGFS
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS
Magna 2013 49 (15.03)
mean (SD)
56 (13.30)
mean (SD)
54:24 52:25
Rasmussen 2011 52 (18 ‐ 74)
mean (range)
51 (18 ‐ 75)
mean (range)
90:35 94:30
Vernermo 2016 47 (13.4) [20 ‐ 73]
mean (SD) [range]
48.3 (12.7) [20 ‐ 73]
mean (SD) [range]
55:18 58:18
EVLA versus CA
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
EVLA CA EVLA CA
Calik 2019 38.4 (11.9)
mean (SD)
38.6 (11.6)
mean (SD)
114:86 109:91
EVLA versus MOCA
Study Age (years) Ses (F:M)
EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA
Vähäaho 2019 49.5 (11.9)
mean (SD)
50.9 (12.0)
mean (SD)
N/A N/A
EVLA versus HL/S (surgery)
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
EVLA HL/S (surgery) EVLA HL/S (surgery)
Darwood 2008 EVLT1: 42 (30.5 ‐ 54.5);
EVLT2: 52 (35 ‐ 59);
mean (IQR)
49 (38.5 ‐ 57.5)
mean (IQR)
EVLT1: 22:16
EVLT2: 16:11
16:14
Flessenkämper 2013 47.4 (12.9)
mean (SD)
47.7 (11.5)
mean (SD)
97:45 112:47
HELP‐1 2011 49 (14)
mean (SD)
49 (13)
mean (SD)
85:54 90:47
Magna 2013 49 (15.03)
mean (SD)
52 (15.59)
mean (SD)
54:24 46:22
Pronk 2010 49 (11.0)
mean (SD)
50 (10.5)
mean (SD)
46:16 53:15
Rasmussen 2007 53 (26 ‐ 79)
mean (range)
54 (22 ‐ 78)
mean (range)
41:21 43:16
Rasmussen 2011 52 (18 ‐ 74)
mean (SD)
50 (19 ‐ 72)
mean (range)
90:35 95:29
RELACS 2012 47.9 (10.9)
mean (SD)
48.0 (10.7)
mean (SD)
113:48 124:61
Vernermo 2016 47 (13.4) [20 ‐ 73]
mean (SD) [range]
47.3 (11.3) [27 ‐ 75]
mean (SD) [range]
55:18 55:10
RFA versus UGFS
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
RFA UGFS RFA UGFS
Rasmussen 2011 51 (23 ‐ 75)
mean (range)
51 (18 ‐ 75)
mean (range)
88:37 94:30
RFA versus CA
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
RFA CA RFA CA
Morrison 2015 50.5 (25.6 ‐ 70.1)
mean (range)
49.0 (26.6 ‐ 70.6)
mean (range)
93:21 83:25
RFA versus MOCA
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
RFA MOCA RFA MOCA
Lane 2017 58
(median)
54.5
(median)
50:33 50:37
MARADONA 2019 53.4 (22.6 ‐ 77.9)
median (range)
54.9 (16.3 ‐ 18.2)
median (range)
63:43 67:40
Vähäaho 2019 50.3 (13.9)
mean (SD)
50.9 (12.0)
mean (SD)
N/A N/A
RFA versus HL/S (surgery)
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
RFA HL/S (surgery) RFA HL/S (surgery)
EVOLVeS 2003 49 (4)
mean (SD)
47 (4)
mean (SD)
32:12 26:10
Helmy ElKaffas 2011 33.1 (2.6)
mean (SD)
34.9 (3.7)
mean (SD)
48:42 45:45
Rasmussen 2011 51 (23 ‐ 75)
mean (range)
50 (19 ‐ 72)
mean (range)
88:37 95:29
Rautio 2002 33 (6.7)
mean (SD)
38 (6.8)
mean (SD)
14:1 12:1
Subramonia 2010 47 (38 ‐ 58)
median (IQR)
45 (37 ‐ 53)
median (IQR)
34:13 27:14
UGFS versus HL/S (surgery)
Study Age (years) Sex (F:M)
UGFS HL/S (surgery) UGFS HL/S (surgery)
FOAM 2010 55.8 (13.4)
mean (SD)
54.6 (13.4)
mean (SD)
175:58 162:65
Magna 2013 56 (13.30)
mean (SD)
52 (15.59)
mean (SD)
52:25 46:22
Rasmussen 2011 51 (18 ‐ 75)
mean (range)
50 (19 ‐ 72)
mean (range)
94:30 95:29
Vernermo 2016 48.3 (12.7) [20 ‐ 73]
mean (SD) [range]
47.3 (11.3) [27 ‐ 75]
mean (SD) [range]
58:18 55:10

CA: cyanoacrylate glue
EVLA: endovenous laser ablation (same as EVLT)
EVLT: endovenous laser therapy
EVSA: endovenous steam ablation
F: female
HL/S: high ligation and stripping
IQR: interquartile range
M: male
MOCA: mechanochemical ablation
RFA: radio frequency ablation
SD: standard deviation
UGFS: ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy