Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 11;2021(8):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub4

10. Post‐operative complications within three months.

Early post‐operative complications (within three months)
EVLA versus RFA
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique EVLA RFA EVLA RFA EVLA RFA EVLA RFA EVLA RFA EVLA RFA EVLA RFA EVLA RFA
Nordon 2011     2/78
(2.6)
1/77
(1.3)
2/78
(2.6)
1/76
(1.3)
0/78
(0)
0/76
(0)
    2/78
(2.6)
1/76
(1.3)
0/78
(0)
0/76
(0)
   
Rasmussen 2011a 1/125
(0.8)
0/121
(0)
3/125
(2.4)
6/121
(5)
        3/125
(2.4)
8/121
(6.6
4/125
(3.2)
12/121
(9.9)
0/125
(0)
1/121
(0.8)
0/125
(0)
0/121
(0)
Recovery 2009     2/41
(4.9)
1/46
(2.2)
        0/41
(0)
1/46
(2.2)
6/41
(14.6)
0/46
(0)
    1/41
(2.2)
0/46
(0)
Shepherd 2010 2/64
(3)
0/67
(0)
5/64
(8)
8/67
(12)
    1/64
(2)
2/67
(3)
2/64
(3)
6/67
(9)
5/64
(7)
5/67
(7)
2/64
(3)
4/67
(6)
0/64
(0)
1/67
(1) PE
Syndor 2017     9/96
(9.4)
13/97
(13.7)
0/96
(0)
0/97
(0)
    3/96
(3.1)
3/97
(3.1)
1/96
(1)
1/97
(1.0)
3/96
(3.1)
2/97
(2.1)
0/96
(0)
0/97
(0)
EVLA versus EVSA
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA EVLA EVSA
LAST 2014     0/109
(0)
1/117
(0.9)
0/109
(0)
0/117
(0)
0/109
(0)
0/117
(0)
    10/109
(9.2)
10/117
(8.5)
0/109
(0)
0/117
(0)
1/109
(0.9) DVT
0/117
(0)
EVLA versus UGFS
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS EVLA UGFS
Magna 2013     2/78
(2.6)
1/77
(1.3)
        2/78
(2.6)
1/77
(1.3)
    0/78
(0)
0/77
(0)
0/78
(0)
0/77
(0)
Rasmussen 2011a 1/125
(0.8)
1/124
(0.8)
3/125
(2.4)
2/124
(1.6)
        3/125
(2.4)
8/124
(6.5)
4/125
(3.2)
17/124
(13.7)
0/125
(0)
4/124
(3.2)
0/125
(0)
1/124
(0.8)
Vernermo 2016 31/73
(42)
14/72
(20)
1/73
(1)
2/72
(2)
        3/73
(5)
50/72
(67)
    3/73
(4)
0/72
(0)
   
EVLA versus CA
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique EVLA CA EVLA CA EVLA CA EVLA CA EVLA CA EVLA CA EVLA CA EVLA CA
Calik 2019b     28/200
(11)
6/200
(3)
        63/200
(31)
31/200
(15.5)
14/200
(7)
7/200
(3.5)
    2/200
(1)
 
EVLA versus MOCA
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA EVLA MOCA
Vähäaho 2019     4/34
(12)
0/65
(0)
                0/34
(0)
1/65
(1.5)
   
EVLA versus HL/S (surgery)
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S EVLA HL/S
Darwood 2008a 0/80
(0)
0/32
(0)
1/80
(1)
4/32
(13)
        1/80
(1)
2/32
(6)
9/80
(11)
0/32
(0)
0/80
(0)
2/32
(6)
0/80
(0)
1/32c
(3)
Flessenkämper 2013     24/142
(17)
23/159
(15)
        68/142
(48)
108/159
(68)
        1/142
(0.7)
1/159
(0.6)
HELP‐1 2011 1/137
(0.7)
11/133
(8.3)
4/137
(2.9)
13/133
(9.8)
        5/137
(3.6)
3/133
(2.2)
4/137
(2.9)
6/133
(4.5)
2/137
(1.5)
8/133
(6)
   
Magna 2013     2/78
(2.6)
4/68
(5.9)
        2/78
(2.6)
0/68
(0)
    0/78
(0)
3/68
(4.4)
0/78
(0)
0/68
(0)
Pronk 2010     2/62
(3)
1/68
(1)
                       
Rasmussen 2007a 3/69d
(5)
5/68
(8)
1/69
(2)
1/68
(5.9)
0/69
(0)
0/68
(0)
0/69
(0)
1/68
(2)
7/69
(11)
15/68
(25)
2/69
(3)
2/68
(3)
0/69
(0)
1/68e
(2)
0/69
(0)
0/68
(0)
Rasmussen 2011a 1/125
(0.8)
1/119
(0.8)
3/125
(2.4)
5/119
(4.2)
        3/125
(2.4)
6/119
(5)
4/125
(3.2)
5/119
(4.2)
0/125
(0)
0/119
(0.8)
0/125
(0)
1/119
(0.8)
RELACS 2012                 169/185
(91)
145/161
(90)
20/185
(10.8)
4/161
(2.5)
1/185
(0.5)
0/161
(0)
3/185
(1.6)
1/161
(0.6)
Vernermo 2016 31/73
(42)
40/65
(62)
1/73
(1)
2/65
(3)
        3/73
(4)
3/65
(4)
    3/73
(4)
3/65
(4)
   
RFA versus UGFS
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique RFA UGFS RFA UGFS RFA UGFS RFA UGFS RFA UGFS RFA UGFS RFA UGFS RFA UGFS
Rasmussen 2011a 0/121
(0)
1/124
(0.8)
6/121
(0.8)
2/124
(1.6)
        8/121
(6.6)
8/124
(6.5)
12/121
(9.9)
17/124
(13.7)
1/121
(0.8)
4/124
(3.2)
0/121
(0)
1/124
(0.8)
RFA versus CA
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique RFA CA RFA CA RFA CA RFA CA RFA CA RFA CA RFA CA RFA CA
Morrison 2015     3/114
(3)
3/108
(3)
1/114
(1)
0/108
(0)
        16/114
(14)
22/108
(20)
1/114
(1)
1/114
(1)
0/114
(0)
0/108
(0)
RFA versus MOCA
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique RFA MOCA RFA MOCA RFA MOCA RFA MOCA RFA MOCA RFA MOCA RFA MOCA RFA MOCA
Lane 2017                                
MARADONA 2019 15/104
(14)
14/105
(13)
3/104
(3)
1/105
(1)
0/104
(0)
0/105
(0)
0/105
(0)
1/104
(1)
2/104
(2)
7/105
(7)
8/104
(8)
12/105
(11)
    3/104
(3)
 
Vähäaho 2019                         1/65
(1.5)
0/65
(0)
   
RFA versus HL/S (surgery)
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique RFA HL/S RFA HL/S RFA HL/S RFA HL/S RFA HL/S RFA HL/S RFA HL/S RFA HL/S
EVOLVeS 2003 6/44
(14)
18/36
(50)
10/44
(23)
5/36
(4.2)
        14/44
(32)
23/36
(64)
    0/44
(0)
2/36
(6)f
0/44
(0)
0/36
(0)
Helmy ElKaffas 2011 1/90
(1.1)
30/90
(33.3)
9/90
(10)
3/90
(3.3)
0/90
(0)
0/90
(0)
        6/90
(6.6)
0/90
(0)
0/90
(0)
3/90
(3.3)
0/90
(0)
1/90
(1.1)
Rasmussen 2011a 0/121
(0)
1/119
(0.8)
6/121
(4.9)
5/119
(4.2)
        8/121
(6.6)
6/119
(5)
12/121
(9.9)
5/119
(4.2)
1/121
(0.8)
1/119
(0.8)
0/121
(0)
1/119
(0.8)
Rautio 2002 1/15
(7)
4/13
(31)
2/15
(13)
3/13
(23)
1/15
(7)
0/13
(0)
0/15
(0)
0/13
(0)
0/15
(0)
0/13
(0)
3/15
(20)
0/13
(0)
0/15
(0)
0/13
(0)
0/15
(0)
0/13
(0)
Subramonia 2010 0/47
(0)
0/47
(0)
9/47
(19)
20/41
(49)
0/47
(0)
0/41
(0)
0/47
(0)
7/41
(17)
5/47
(11)
0/41
(0)
0/47
(0)
0/41
(0)
0/47
(0)
0/41
(0)
0/47
(0)
0/41
(0)
UGFS versus HL/S (surgery)
Study Minor (not requiring intervention) (%) Major (requiring intervention) (%)
Adverse event Haematoma (wound or thigh) Saphenous nerve injury Thermal injury/ inflammation Wound problems (groin/stab) Bruising and pigmentation Phlebitis Wound problems Other
Technique UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S UGFS HL/S
FOAM 2010 0/217
(0)
3/176
(1.7)
0/217
(0)
6/176
(3.4)
            17/217
(7.8)
0/176
(0)
0/217
(0)
4/176
(2.3)
0/176
(0)
0/217
(0.9)
Magna 2013     1/77
(1.3)
4/68
(5.9)
        1/77
(1.3)
0/68
(0)
    0/77
(0)
3/68
(4.4)
0/77
(0)
0/68
(0)
Rasmussen 2011a 1/124
(0.8)
1/119
(0.8)
2/124
(1.6)
5/119
(4.2)
        8/124
(6.5)
6/119
(5)
17/124
(14)
5/119
(4.2)
4/124
(3.2)
1/119
(0.8)
1/124
(0.8)
1/119
(0.8)
Vernermo 2016 14/72
(20)
40/65
(62)
2/72
(2)
2/65
(3)
        5/72
(7)
3/65
(4)
    0/72
(0)
3/65
(4)
   

aResults only available per limb, not per participant
bTwo participants developed DVTs.
cPost‐operative acute respiratory distress syndrome (requiring seven days intensive therapy unit (ITU) support) following aspiration post‐operatively
dIn one participant, the saphenous thrombus extended into the femoral vein; it resolved without intervention. 
eGroin infection requiring antibiotics
fIncludes one participant who required debridement and intravenous antibiotics for a 'thigh and calf infection'

CA: cyanoacrylate glue
DVT: deep vein thrombosis
EVLA: endovenous laser ablation
EVSA: endovenous steam ablation
HL/S: high ligation and stripping
MOCA: mechanochemical ablation
PE: pulmonary embolism
RFA: radio frequency ablation
UGFS: ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy