Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD001406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001406.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Baker 1996 Products included in trial purchased around 15 years ago
Clarke‐O'Neill 2002 All participants tested washable pants with integral pad for light incontinence, no direct comparison between products
Clarke‐O'Neill 2004 All participants tested disposable pads for light incontinence, no direct comparison between products
Cottenden 1997 Not a clinical trial
Cottenden 2006 Not a clinical trial
McClish 1999 Not a randomized controlled trial of products. Data on pad use and costs taken from women participating in an incontinence treatment study.
Sabatier 1997 Not a randomised controlled trial, no suitable intervention
Thornburn 1997 One design only: disposable inserts were manufactured with different levels of superabsorbent, products not available commercially