Riga 1999.
Methods | Randomisation was provided by an independent computer consultant using a teable of random numbers. The envelopes, containing the operation to be performed, were opened at admission. | |
Participants | 117 patients with synptomatice primary inguinal hernia. Exclusion criteria included patients unsuitable for general anaesthesia and pneumoperitoneum, with previous lower abdominal surgery, and complicated hernias | |
Interventions | Laparoscopic versus open mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. Laparoscopic group: (n=53) repair performed by the TAPP technique. All patients were given general anaesthesia. Open group: (n=52) repair performed by the Lichtenstein technique. All patients were given a local anaesthesia. | |
Outcomes | Included data items:
Operation time (mins)
Postoperative hospital stay
Intraoperative complications
Postoperative complications
Return to normal activities and work Other data items: Use of analgesia Postoperative pain (day 1&2) |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |