Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785

Riga 1999.

Methods Randomisation was provided by an independent computer consultant using a teable of random numbers. The envelopes, containing the operation to be performed, were opened at admission.
Participants 117 patients with synptomatice primary inguinal hernia. Exclusion criteria included patients unsuitable for general anaesthesia and pneumoperitoneum, with previous lower abdominal surgery, and complicated hernias
Interventions Laparoscopic versus open mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. 
 Laparoscopic group: (n=53) repair performed by the TAPP technique. All patients were given general anaesthesia. 
 Open group: (n=52) repair performed by the Lichtenstein technique. All patients were given a local anaesthesia.
Outcomes Included data items: 
 Operation time (mins) 
 Postoperative hospital stay 
 Intraoperative complications 
 Postoperative complications 
 Return to normal activities and work
Other data items: 
 Use of analgesia 
 Postoperative pain (day 1&2)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate