Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256064

Table 4. Socio-demographic characteristics of female perpetrators, female controls and total population.

N = 110; 10 perpetrators and 100 controls.

Factors Perpetrators n = 10 Controls n = 100 Total n 110 Fisher’s exact 2-sided test
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Age*
20–30 1 (10.0) 10 (10.0) 11 (11.0)
31–40 3 (30.0) 30 (30.0) 33 (30.0) 1
41–50 3 (30.0) 30 (30.0) 33 (30.0)
51–60 3 (30.0) 30 (30.0) 33 (30.0)
≥61 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Marital status**
Married/registered partner 3 (30.0) 49 (49.0) 52 (47.3)
Unmarried 5 (50.0) 36 (36.0) 41 (37.3) 0.493
Divorced/widow 2 (20.0) 14 (14.0) 16 (14.5)
Missing - 1 (1.0) 1 (0.9)
Education**
Pre-secondary, ≤9 years 3 (30.0) 12 (12.0) 15 (13.6)
Secondary, 9–12 years 6 (60.0) 48 (48.0) 54 (49.1) 0.015
Post-secondary,> 12 years 0 (0.0) 38 (38.0) 38 (34.5)
Missing 1 (10.0) 2 (2.0) 3 (2.7)
Housing standard**
House 3 (30.0) 47 (47.0) 50 (45.5)
Owned apartment 0 (0.0) 15 (15.0) 15 (13.6) 0.124
Rented apartment 7 (70.0) 36 (36.0) 43 (39.1)
Missing - 2 (2.0) 2 (1.8)
Disposable annual income**
Low 4 (40.0) 22 (22.0) 26 (23.6)
Medium 6 (60.0) 63 (63.0) 69 (62.7) 0.321
High 0 (0.0) 14 (14.0) 14 (12.7)
Missing - 1 (1.0) 1 (0.9)
Receiving benefits**
Yes 2 (20.0) 3 (3.0) 5 (4.5) 0.064
No 8 (80.0) 97 (97.0) 105 (95.5)
Employment status**
Employed 3 (30.0) 76 (76.0) 79 (71.8)
Unemployed 7 (70.0) 23 (23.0) 30 (27.3) 0.004
Missing - 1 (1.0) 1 (0.9)
Education, mother***
Pre-secondary, ≤9 years 5 (50.0) 27 (27.0) 32 (29.1)
Secondary, 10–12 years 4 (40.0) 34 (34.0) 38 (34.5) 0.739
Post-secondary,> 12 years 1 (10.0) 12 (12.0) 14 (12.7)
Missing - 30 (26.0) 26 (23.6)
Education, father***
Pre-secondary, ≤9 years 1 (10.0) 20 (20.0) 21 (19.1)
Secondary, 10–12 years 3 (30.0) 37 (37.0) 40 (36.4) 1
Post-secondary, > 12 years 1 (10.0) 10 (10.0) 11 (10.0)
Missing 5 (50.0) 33 (33.0) 38 (34.5)

* Age in index year.

** Figure valid one year before the crime occurred.

*** Highest registered level of education.

Due to the small female perpetrator sample size, the decision was made not to proceed with bivariable analyses, as this might have generated a risk of false conclusions.