Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;12(19):5960–5966. doi: 10.7150/jca.58154

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model

Variable n Univariate a Multivariate b
p value HR c 95% CI d p-value
Total 81
Sex
Male vs. Female 51 vs. 30 0.357
Age (years)
≥ 65 vs. < 65 43 vs. 38 0.776
BMI (kg/m2)
< 18.5 vs. ≥ 18.5 8 vs. 73 0.080
pStagee
pStage III vs. pStage II 34 vs. 47 < 0.001 3.08 1.41-7.22 0.005
Histological type
Undifferentiated vs. Differentiated 49 vs. 32 0.856
Postoperative peak-CRP (mg/dl)
≥ 8.1 vs. < 8.1 45 vs. 36 0.658
Complication (C-Df ≥ II)
Positive vs. Negative 12 vs. 69 0.480
PIAC (weeks)
≥ 7 vs. < 7 23 vs. 58 0.004 2.45 1.13-5.29 0.024
Cumulative S-1 dose/BSAg (mg/m2)
< 12,000 vs. ≥12,000 40 vs. 41 0.002 3.27 1.43-8.37 0.004

a Analyzed by Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test;

b Analyzed by Cox's proportional hazard model;

c HR: hazard ratio, d CI: confidence interval;

e Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma;

f C-D: Clavien-Dindo classification, g BSA: body surface area.