Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 1;21:376. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02841-7

Table 3.

Outcome measures of the primary and secondary endpoints of the BOOST pACP program

Outcomes Measurement instrument No. of items Unit of analysis Timepoint
T0 T1 T2
Primary endpoint
1. Quality of Parent-Adolescent Communication Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) [32] 20 items Adolescent x
Secondary endpoints
2. Quality of Parent-Adolescent Communication PACS 20 items Adolescent x x
3. Attitude on talking with the other (parent(s)/ their child) about what the adolescent finds important regarding his/her care and treatment Created by the research teama 8 items Adolescent x x x
7 items Parent(s) x x x
4. Self-efficacy towards talking with the other (parent(s)/ their child) about different ACP themes Created by the research teama 9 items Adolescent x x x
4a. if the child initiates the conversation Created by the research teama 9 items Parent(s) x x x
4b. to initiate the conversation his/herself Created by the research teama 9 items Parent(s) x x x
5. Self-efficacy towards talking with their child and letting their child talk in different situations Created by the research teama 6 items Parent(s) x x x
6. Behaviour: talking with the other (parent(s)/ their child) about different ACP themes Created by the research teama 9 items Adolescent x x x
9 items Parent(s) x x x
7. Intention to talk with the other (parent(s)/ their child) parent(s) about different ACP themes Created by the research teama 9 items Adolescent x x x
9 items Parent(s) x x x
8. Behaviour: talking with paediatric oncologist about different ACP themes Created by the research teama 9 items Adolescent x x x
9. Intention to talk with paediatric oncologist about different ACP themes Created by the research teama 9 items Adolescent x x x
10. Anxiety PROMIS Anxiety 8a Short version [33]b 8 items Adolescent x x x
PROMIS 7a Short version [34]b 7 items Parent(s) x x x
11. Level of shared decision making CollaboRATE Scale [35, 36]c 3 items Parent(s) x x x
12. Satisfaction items for the intervention group Created by the research team 14 items Adolescent and parent(s) x x
13. Behaviour & intention to discuss ACP with the family Created by the research team 3 items Oncologist x x x
14. Quality of Life EQ-5D-Y [37] 6 items Adolescent x x x
Background characteristics
15. Demographic and background information Created by the research team 3 items Adolescent x
14 items Parent(s) x
16. Disease & treatment information about adolescent Created by the research team 7–10 items Oncologist x x x

aThe following procedure was followed: 1) The Theory of Planned Behaviour instructed ways items were formulated regarding the four key constructs operationalizing ACP as a health behaviour: attitude, self-efficacy, intention and actual behaviour; 2) the prototype instrument was linguistically improved and made age appropriate by a literacy expert agency; 3) cognitive interviews with adolescents who were diagnosed with cancer (n = 4) and parents (n = 6) were then performed; 4) feedback using thematic analysis and discussions with the researchers informed refinements. Response categories: ‘Strongly Disagree’, ‘Disagree’, ‘Neither Agree Nor Disagree’, ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly Agree’

bResponse categories: ‘Never’, ‘Rarely’, ‘Sometimes’, ‘Often’, or ‘Always’.

cResponse categories: 10 – point Likert scale, ranging from ‘No effort was made’ (=0) to ‘Every effort was made’ (=10)