Asawanonda 2006.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, active placebo‐controlled, double‐blind Date of study: not reported Location: Bangkok, Thailand, Asia |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 24 participants (mean age 40 years (methotrexate) 48 years (placebo), 15 male) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Methotrexate (n = 11), 15 mg/week, orally Control B. Placebo (n = 13), orally Co‐intervention: phototherapy UVB |
|
Outcomes | Assessment at 24 weeks Primary outcomes of the trial
Secondary outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | Funding: (quote p 1013) no funding source Declarations of interest: (quote p 1013) "None identified" |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 1014): "randomized by way of randomization cards" Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 1014): "to receive either MTX or placebo, which were identical in appearance" Comment: probably done, placebo‐controlled |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 1015): "PASI scores were given by a investigator blinded to the treatment assignment" Comment: probably done, placebo‐controlled |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Randomly assigned 24, analysed 24 Management of missing data: Comment: no more precision regarding methods for dealing with missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no protocol available. The outcomes mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported. |