Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;2021(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4

AURIEL‐PsO 2020.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT, active‐controlled, double‐blind trial
Date of study: February 2016 ‐ December 2017
Location: world‐wide
Participants Randomised: 443 participants
Inclusion criteria
  • Men or women ≥ 18 years old with a clinical diagnosis of stable moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis (defined by PASI score ≥ 12, PGA score ≥ 3, and ≥ 10% of body surface area affected at Screening and Baseline [Day 1 of Week 1]) who have a history of receipt of or are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy for active plaque‐type psoriasis despite topical therapy

  • Participants must not have received more than 1 biologic therapy

  • Other protocol‐defined inclusion criteria could apply


Exclusion criteria
  • People were excluded if they have erythrodermic, pustular, guttate, or medication‐induced forms of psoriasis or other active skin diseases/infections that may interfere with the evaluation of plaque psoriasis

  • Participants must not have received adalimumab or an investigational or licensed biosimilar of adalimumab; topical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis or ultraviolet B phototherapy within 2 weeks of investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration or plan to take such treatment during the trial; or psoralen combined with ultraviolet A phototherapy or nonbiological systemic therapies for psoriasis within 4 weeks prior to IMP administration

  • People was excluded if they have a history of an ongoing, chronic, or recurrent infectious disease (except for latent tuberculosis [TB]); history of active TB; or a history of hypersensitivity to any component of the IMP formulation, comparable drugs, or latex

  • Other protocol‐defined exclusion criteria could apply


Dropouts and withdrawals
  • 28/443 (6.3%):


Biosimilar group (9), Humira group (19)
  • Not treated: Biosimilar group (1), Humira group (1)

  • Participant decision: Biosimilar group (1), Humira group (4)

  • Lost to follow‐up: Biosimilar group (1), Humira group (2)

  • Lack of efficacy: Biosimilar group (0), Humira group (2)

  • Protocol violation: Biosimilar group (3), Humira group (1)

  • AEs: Biosimilar group (2), Humira group (9)

  • Others: Biosimilar group (1), Humira group (0)

Interventions Intervention
A. Biological: MSB11022, S/C, Biosimilar adalimumab week 0: 80 mg, week 1: 40 mg, then 40 mg EOW, n = 222
Control Intervention
B. Biological: adalimumab (Humira) week 0: 80mg, week 1: 40 mg, then 40 mg EOW, n = 221
Outcomes At 16 weeks
Primary outcome
  • PASI 75


Secondary outcomes
  • PASI 90 and PASI 75 after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 52 weeks

  • Quality of life at 16 weeks

Notes Funding:
Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Inc.
Conflict of interest: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): "Allocation: randomized"
Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee random sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): "Double (Participant, Investigator)"
Comment: probably done
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): "Double (Participant, Investigator)"
Comment: probably done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Dealing with missing data: not stated
Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov: Per protocol analyses (non‐inferiority trial)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02660580)
The prespecified outcomes and those mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported