AURIEL‐PsO 2020.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, active‐controlled, double‐blind trial Date of study: February 2016 ‐ December 2017 Location: world‐wide |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 443 participants Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
Biosimilar group (9), Humira group (19)
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Biological: MSB11022, S/C, Biosimilar adalimumab week 0: 80 mg, week 1: 40 mg, then 40 mg EOW, n = 222 Control Intervention B. Biological: adalimumab (Humira) week 0: 80mg, week 1: 40 mg, then 40 mg EOW, n = 221 |
|
Outcomes |
At 16 weeks Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes | Funding: Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Inc. Conflict of interest: not stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): "Allocation: randomized" Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee random sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): "Double (Participant, Investigator)" Comment: probably done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (ClinicalTrials.gov): "Double (Participant, Investigator)" Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dealing with missing data: not stated Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov: Per protocol analyses (non‐inferiority trial) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02660580) The prespecified outcomes and those mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported |