Gurel 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, placebo‐controlled, single‐blind Date of study: not stated Location: one centre, Turkey |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 50 participants (mean age 43 years, 25 male) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts No participants lost to follow‐up |
|
Interventions |
Intervention Acitretine (0.3 ‐ 0.5 mg/kg/day, 25 mg) (n = 25) Control intervention Placebo (n = 25) Co‐invervention NBUVB |
|
Outcomes | Assessment at 12 weeks Primary outcome
Outcomes:
|
|
Notes | Funding: none Declarations of interest: none |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No description |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No description |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote (p 3): "The physicians were not blinded" Comment: high risk of performance bias |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 3): "An independent assessor who is not from the team performed the outcome assessment." Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Randomised 50, analysed 50, no loss to follow‐up during the 12 weeks Comment: probably done |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no protocol was available. The prespecified outcomes mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported |