Papp 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, active/placebo‐controlled, double‐blind Date of study: November 2010 ‐ June 2012 Location: 64 centres in Europe, Asia and North America |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 355 participants (mean age 45 years, 270 male) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Tildrakizumab (n = 42), SC, 5 mg weeks 0, 4, every 12 weeks Control intervention B. Tildrakizumab (n = 92), SC, 15 mg weeks 0, 4, every 12 weeks C. Tildrakizumab (n = 89), SC, 50 mg weeks 0, 4, every 12 weeks D. Tildrakizumab (n = 86), SC, 100 mg weeks 0, 4, every 12 weeks E. Tildrakizumab (n = 46), SC, 200 mg weeks 0, 4, every 12 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Assessments at 16 weeks Primary outcomes of the trial
Secondary outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | Funding source: Quote (p 930): “This study was funded by Merck & Co, nc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA”. Declarations of interest (Appendix 1): "E.P.B., A.M., Q.L., Y.Z. and R.S. are current or former employees of Merck & Co., Inc. K.P. has served as a consultant, advisory board member and/or investigator for Abbott (AbbVie), Amgen, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Foreward Pharma, Galderma, Genentech, Incyte, Isotechnika, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Medimmune, Merck Sharp Dome, Merck Serono, Novartis, Regeneron, Stiefel, Takeda, Pfizer and USB. D.T. has served as a consultant, advisory board member and/or investigator for Abbott (AbbVie), Almiral, Amgen, Astellas, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dignity, Forward Pharma, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Isotechnika, Janssen‐Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Maruho, Medac, Medimmune, Merck Sharp Dome, Merck Serono, Novartis, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi‐Aventis, Takeda and Pfizer. K.R. has served as a consultant and/or paid speaker for and/or participated in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen‐Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Vertex and Takeda. E.R. has received travel support and nonfinancial support for histology study report preparation from Merck & Co., Inc., and has received speaker’s fees and travel support, or served on advisory boards for Abb‐ Vie, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen and Amgen. R.G.L. has served as a consultant and/or paid speaker for and/or participated in clinical trials sponsored by companies that manufacture drugs used for the treatment of psoriasis, including AbbVie, Celgene, Centocor, Janssen‐Cilag, LEO Pharma, Merck, MSD (formerly Essex, Schering‐Plough), Novartis and Pfizer (formerly Wyeth). J.G.K. has received personal fees (consulting and/or speaking fees) and grants paid to his institution from Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Kadmon, Dermira, Boehringer and BMS; Amgen, Innovaderm, Paraxel and Kyowa have paid grants to J.G.K.’s institution; J.G.K. has also received personal fees from Serono, Biogen Idec, Delenex, AbbVie, Sanofi, Baxter, Xenoport and Kineta. A.B.G. has current consulting/advisory board agreements with Amgen Inc., Astellas, Akros, Centocor (Janssen) Inc., Celgene Corp., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Beiersdorf Inc., Abbott Labs (AbbVie), TEVA, Actelion, UCB, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Dermipsor Ltd, Incyte, Pfizer, Canfite, Lilly, Coronado, Vertex, Karyopharm, CSL Behring Biotherapies for Life, GlaxoSmithKline, Xenoport, Catabasis Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd, Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Development America, Inc, and has received research/educational grants (paid to Tufts Medical Center) from Centocor (Janssen), Amgen, Abbott (Abb‐ Vie), Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Lilly, Coronado, Levia, Merck and Xenoport. H.N. has received consultancy/speaker honoraria and/or grants from Novartis, Tanabe Mitsubishi, Maruho, Abbott/AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen and LEO Pharma." |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote (p 931): “Randomisation of treatment and allocation was done centrally by means of an interactive web response system…" Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee the random sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 931): “Randomisation of treatment and allocation was done centrally by means of an interactive web response system…” Comment: probably done |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote (p 931): “double‐blind" Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote (p 932): “double‐blind" Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Randomly assigned 355, analysed 352 Management of missing data: Quote (p 932): “The primary analysis was performed on all randomised participants who received at least one or more doses of treatment. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to week 16... were considered to not have achieved PASI 75 at week 16" Comment: low number lost to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01225731) The prespecified outcomes and those mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported |