ReSURFACE‐2 2017.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, active/placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial Date of study: 12 February 2013 ‐ 28 September 2015 Location: 132 sites in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Israel, Netherlands, Poland, and the USA Phase 3 |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 1090 participants Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
Tildra 200 (14), Tildra 100 (12), ETA (24), PBO (14)
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention Tildrakizumab 200 mg (SC on weeks 0, 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52), n = 314 Control interventions Tildrakizumab 100 mg (SC on weeks 0, 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52), n = 307 Etanercept 50 mg (twice weekly until week 12 and once weekly from week 12 to week 28), n = 313 Placebo, n = 156 |
|
Outcomes |
At week 12 Primary outcome (composite outcome)
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes | Funding Quote (p 276): "Funding Merck & Co" Conflicts of interest Quote (p 287): "Declaration of interests: KR has served as a consultant or paid speaker for, or participated in clinical trials sponsored by, Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen‐Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen‐Cilag, Leo, Lilly, Medac, Merck & Co, Novartis, Pfizer, Vertex, and Takeda. KAP has served as a consultant or paid speaker for, or participated in clinical trials sponsored by, Amgen, Anacor, AbbVie, Active Biotech, Allergan, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Biogen‐Idec, BMS, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, CanFite, Celgene, Dermira, Eli‐Lilly, Forward Pharma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa Hako Kirin, Kythera, Leo Pharma, Merck & Co, Merck‐Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Rigel, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Takeda, UCB, Valeant, Xenon, and Xoma. AB has served as a scientific adviser and clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dermira, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck & Co, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun, UCB, and Valeant, and as a paid speaker for Lilly. SKT has participated in trials supported by grants from Merck & Co. RS has served as a consultant or paid speaker for, or participated in clinical trials sponsored by, Leo Pharma, Amgen, Novartix, Merck & Co, Celgene, Coherus Biosciences, Janssen, Regeneron, MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Cutanea, Samson Clinical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfiizer, MSD, Oncobiologics, Roche, Eli Lilly, and Bayer. DT has served as a consultant, advisory board member, or an investigator for Abbott (AbbVie), Almiral, Amgen, Astellas, Biogen‐Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dignity, Forward‐Pharma, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Isotechnika, Janssen‐Cilag, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Maruho, Medac, Medimmune, Merck & Co, Merck‐Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi‐Aventis, and Takeda. KN is a former employee of Merck & Co; AM, NC, QL, KL, CLR, and SG are current Merck & Coemployees. ABK is a consultant and investigator for Merck & Co, Amgen, AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Dermira, and Pfizer, a consultant for Sun Pharmaceuticals, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Lilly, and VBL, and has received fellowship funding from Janssen." |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 278): "In reSURFACE 1, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, or placebo...In reSURFACE 2, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1:2) to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, placebo, or etanercept 50 mg...Parexel International, the contract research organisation, generated computergenerated randomisation sequences, and an interactive voice‐response system and interactive web‐response system was used by Parexel to allocate participants to groups. Randomised treatment assignments on day 1 were done by region" Comment: Probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 278): "In reSURFACE 1, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, or placebo...In reSURFACE 2, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1:2) to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, placebo, or etanercept 50 mg...Parexel International, the contract research organisation, generated computergenerated randomisation sequences, and an interactive voice‐response system and interactive web‐response system was used by Parexel to allocate participants to groups. Randomised treatment assignments on day 1 were done by region" Comment: Probably done |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 279): "Investigators, participants, and study personnel were blinded to group allocation and remained blinded until completion of the studies. A double‐masking technique was used, in which tildrakizumab and its matching placebo or etanercept and its matching placebo were identical in appearance and packaging. Additional placebo doses were administered to maintain masking. The team doing the analysis was blinded until the database was locked." Comment: probably done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p279): "Investigators, participants, and study personnel were blinded to group allocation and remained blinded until completion of the studies. A double‐masking technique was used, in which tildrakizumab and its matching placebo or etanercept and its matching placebo were identical in appearance and packaging. Additional placebo doses were administered to maintain masking. The team doing the analysis was blinded until the database was locked." Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dealing with missing data Quote (pp 280‐1): "We specified full‐analysis‐set, intention‐to‐treat, and per protocol patient populations in the study protocols...Patients with missing data were treated as non‐responders (non‐responder imputation [NRI])." Randomised 1090, Analysed 1090 |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01729754) The prespecified outcomes and those mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported Results are posted on ClinicalTrials.gov |