TRANSFIGURE 2016.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, active‐controlled, double‐blind trial, phase 3 Date of study: November 2013 ‐ January 2017 Location: world‐wide |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 198 participants Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
Secu 150 (4), Secu 300 (1), PBO (7)
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Biological: secukinumab 150 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then once every 4 weeks up to and including Week 128, n = 67 ControlIntervention B. Biological: secukinumab 300 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then once every 4 weeks up to and including Week 128, n = 66 C. Biological: Placebo, n = 65 |
|
Outcomes |
At week 16 Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes | Funding Quote (p 1): "Funding sources: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland." Conflicts of interest Quote (Appendix): "Conflicts of interest. K.R. has participated in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen‐ Cilag, LEO, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and Vertex; and has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen‐Cilag, LEO, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and Vertex. J.S. has received educational grants from Novartis, AbbVie and Pfizer; and has received consultancy fees from Novartis, AbbVie, Pfizer and Eli Lilly. P.A. has received grants from Novartis. U.M. has received grants and/or participated in clinical trials for Abbott/AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, BASF, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medac, MSD, Miltenyi Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva, VBL and Xenoport; has served as an advisor for and/or received speaker honoraria and/or grants from Abbott/Abb‐ Vie, Almirall, Amgen, BASF, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medac, MSD, Miltenyi Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva, VBL and Xenoport; has participated in clinical trials by Novartis, AbbVie, UCB, Valeant, Athenex, MC2 Therapeutics, Dermira, Kadmon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galderma, Regeneron, Coherus, Tolmar, Amgen, Total, Watson, Sandoz, Xenoport, AbGenomics and Lilly; and has received consulting fees or speaker honoraria from Novartis, Celgene and AbbVie. M.A. has received grants from and/or participated in clinical trials for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Janssen‐Cilag, LEO, Medac, MSD (formerly Essex, Schering‐Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (formerly Wyeth), Pohl Boskamp, Sandoz and Xenoport; and has served as an advisor for and/or received speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Janssen‐Cilag, LEO, Medac, MSD (formerly Essex, Schering‐Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (formerly Wyeth), Pohl Boskamp, Sandoz and Xenoport. A.P., P.R., R.Y. and M.M. are full‐time employees of Novartis. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 2):"Randomization was managed via a central interactive randomization system and ensured that an equal number of patients were allocated to secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg or placebo, stratified by body weight (< 90 kg or ≥ 90 kg). At week 16, all patients receiving placebo were rerandomized 1: 1 to receive either 300 mg or 150 mg secukinumab." Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 2):"Randomization was managed via a central interactive randomization system and ensured that an equal number of patients were allocated to secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg or placebo, stratified by body weight (< 90 kg or ≥ 90 kg). At week 16, all patients receiving placebo were rerandomized 1: 1 to receive either 300 mg or 150 mg secukinumab." Comment: probably done |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 2): " TRANSFIGURE was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial...Patients received subcutaneous treatments of identical appearance once a week for 5 weeks (at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4), followed by dosing every 4 weeks, starting at week 4 (Appendixes S3 and S4; see Supporting Information)." Comment: probably done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 2): " TRANSFIGURE was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial...Patients received subcutaneous treatments of identical appearance once a week for 5 weeks (at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4), followed by dosing every 4 weeks, starting at week 4 (Appendixes S3 and S4; see Supporting Information)." Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dealing with missing data Quote (p 2): "Missing values for PASI and Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) mod 2011 were imputed using multiple imputation. Missing patient reported outcome values were imputed with last observation carried forward" On ClinicalTrials.gov, randomized 198, analyzed 198 |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01807520) The prespecified outcomes and those mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported REsults are posted on ClinicalTrials.gov |