Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct;11(10):4258–4268. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-178

Table 4. Changes in quantity (area and volume) of adipose tissue between non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced scans in 2D- and 3D-segmentation.

Variables Change 2D (%) Change 3D (%) (20) Difference (%) P 95% CI (%) NRMSE2D NRMSE3D Difference
NES vs. ART (n=23)
    TAT −2.32 (3.63) −3.71 (5.72) −0.52 (7.68) 0.52 −3.43, 1.19 0.071 0.082 +0.011
    VAT −3.51 (3.62) −4.64 (4.29) −1.25 (5.39) 0.25 −3.14, 0.74 0.094 0.071 −0.023
    SAT +0.85 (3.66) −1.32 (6.88) −1.51 (6.87) 0.26 −4.48, 1.57 0.072 0.105 +0.033
NES vs. PVN (n=10)
    TAT −2.69 (2.29) −3.23 (7.58) −1.38 (7.97) 0.49 −8.28, 2.78 0.054 0.103 +0.049
    VAT −6.68 (6.72) −10.23 (5.77) −4.51 (13.95) 0.32 −15.12, 4.21 0.491 0.099 −0.392
    SAT −0.28 (5.93) −0.53 (7.30) −2.90 (15.07) 0.63 −10.05, 9.52 0.318 0.124 −0.194
NES vs. VEN (n=31)
    TAT −6.33 (6.42) −4.72 (8.72) +0.57 (9.80) 0.65 −2.07, 3.66 0.116 0.133 +0.017
    VAT −10.91 (10.47) −9.45 (7.71) +0.06 (11.16) 0.99 −3.80, 3.94 0.225 0.204 −0.021
    SAT −0.31 (7.19) −2.61 (6.97) −0.29 (12.12) 0.85 −4.11, 4.58 0.141 0.167 +0.026

Data are median in% and (IQR in percentage points). ART, arterial scan; CES, contrast-enhanced scan; CI, confidence interval; NES, non-enhanced scan; PVN, portal-venous scan; NRMSE, normalized root-mean-square error; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; TAT, total adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; VEN, venous scan. The P value (and 95% CI) corresponds to the difference of the changes between 2D- and 3D-segmentation.