Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec 3;31(2):222–231. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001966

Table 4:

Univariate Logistic Regression for Patients Undergoing Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy (n=234) versus Ovarian Suppression (n=282) for Ovarian Ablation

Variables Levels OR 95%CI Lower Bounds 95%CI Upper Bounds p-value

Age at Diagnosis as 1 yr increase 1.051 1.021 1.082 <0.001
Year of Diagnosis 2011 vs 2010 1.075 0.589 1.960 0.082
2012 vs 2010 0.832 0.459 1.508
2013 vs 2010 0.581 0.329 1.025
2014 vs 2010 0.597 0.348 1.023
Family History (15 unk.) Yes vs No 1.034 0.724 1.477 0.852
Live Children Yes vs No 1.362 0.910 2.038 0.133
Histology 0.176
Lobular no ductal vs Ductal no lobular 0.927 0.534 1.609
Lobular and ductal vs Ductal no lobular 2.522 1.192 5.334
Inflammatory vs Ductal no lobular 0.630 0.057 7.007
Other vs Ductal no lobular 0.841 0.139 5.083
Grade (32 unk.) G2 vs G1 0.639 0.210 1.941 0.286
G3 vs G1 0.892 0.307 2.598
LN Pos Exact (2 unk.) Yes vs. No 0.901 0.636 1.275 0.556
Stage (59 unk.) II vs. I 1.130 0.745 1.713 0.777
III vs. I 0.962 0.590 1.568
Chemotherapy Yes vs. No 1.179 0.806 1.727 0.396
HER-2 Targeted Trastuzumab vs. None 1.587 0.902 2.790 0.076
Trastuzumab+Other vs. None 1.851 0.929 3.691

The Odds Ratio (OR) is modeled for BSO yes, as OR>1 means more likely to get BSO, OR<1 less likely to get BSO. unk., unknown: number of patients in analysis who did not have documentation for this variable.

BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; OS, ovarian suppression; LN, lymph node