Table 1.
Screening test/test characteristic | Value | Source |
---|---|---|
FIT (per person) | Lin et al,2 2021 | |
Specificity | 0.97 | |
0.07a | ||
Sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm | 0.22b | |
Sensitivity for colorectal cancer | 0.74 | |
sDNA-FIT (per person) | Lin et al,2 2021 | |
Specificity | 0.91 | |
0.15a | ||
Sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm | 0.42b | |
Sensitivity for colorectal cancer | 0.94 | |
Colonoscopy (within reach, per lesion)c | ||
Specificity | 0.86d | Schroy et al,15 2013 |
Sensitivity for adenomas 1 to <6 mm | 0.75 | van Rijn et al,16 2006 |
Sensitivity for adenomas 6 to <10 mm | 0.85 | van Rijn et al,16 2006 |
Sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm | 0.95 | van Rijn et al,16 2006 |
Sensitivity for colorectal cancer | 0.95 | By assumptione |
SIG (within reach, per lesion) | ||
Specificity | 0.87d | Weissfeld et al,17 2005 |
Sensitivity for adenomas 1 to <6 mm | 0.75 | By assumptionf |
Sensitivity for adenomas 6 to <10 mm | 0.85 | By assumptionf |
Sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm | 0.95 | By assumptionf |
Sensitivity for colorectal cancer | 0.95 | By assumptionf |
CTC (per lesion) | Johnson et al,18 2008 | |
Specificity | 0.88g | |
Sensitivity for adenomas 1 to <6 mm | NR | |
Sensitivity for adenomas 6 to <10 mm | 0.57 | |
Sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm | 0.84 | |
Sensitivity for colorectal cancer | 0.84e |
Abbreviations: CTC, computed tomography colonography; FIT, fecal immunochemical test (with positivity cutoff of 20 μg of hemoglobin per gram of feces); NR, not reported (adenoma size < 6 mm [the threshold size for referral to colonoscopy]); sDNA-FIT, multitarget stool DNA test with a fecal immunochemical assay; SIG, flexible sigmoidoscopy.
For persons with nonadvanced adenomas. For persons with adenomas 1 mm to <6 mm, sensitivity was assumed to equal the positivity rate in persons without adenomas. Sensitivity for persons with adenomas 6 mm to <10 mm was chosen such that the weighted mean sensitivity for persons with adenomas 1 mm to <6 mm and 6 mm to <10 mm was equal to the sensitivity for nonadvanced adenomas.
For persons with advanced adenomas (ie, adenomas ≥10 mm, adenomas with advanced histology, or both); the studies in the meta-analysis in Lin et al2 did not provide sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm separately from advanced adenomas.
The same test characteristics were assumed to apply to all colonoscopies, regardless of indication. No correlation in findings at CTC or SIG and follow-up colonoscopy was assumed.
The lack of specificity with endoscopy reflects detection of nonadenomatous polyps, which, in the case of sigmoidoscopy, may lead to unnecessary follow-up colonoscopy, and in the case of colonoscopy, leads to unnecessary polypectomy, which is associated with an increased risk of complications.
Sensitivity for cancer was assumed to be the same as sensitivity for adenomas ≥10 mm because of the small number of cancers detected in screening studies.
Sensitivity for flexible sigmoidoscopy was assumed to equal that of colonoscopy within reach of the sigmoidoscope and 0 for lesions beyond reach of the scope.
The lack of specificity with CTC reflects detection of nonadenomatous lesions ≥6 mm, artifacts, stool, and adenomas smaller than the 6-mm threshold for colonoscopy referral that are measured as ≥6 mm.