Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 9;49(4):385–395. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2021.1948175

Table 1.

Summary of genome assembly of two Quercus species by FLASH program per sample.

Samples Plant species Tissue Total bases (raw PE) Read count (raw tags) Na (%) GCb (%) Q20c (%) Q30d (%)
ML.01 Q. mongolica Leaf 54,126,929 138,342 0 60.96 99.09 95.65
MP.02 Q. mongolica Petiole 41,461,653 106,203 0 60.79 99.09 95.66
MT.03 Q. mongolica Twig 45,367,451 121,913 0 58.14 99.19 96.06
MB.04 Q. mongolica Branch 52,175,663 134,759 0 60.67 99.15 95.90
MS.05 Q. mongolica Stem 48,018,514 123,822 0 59.65 99.05 95.49
MR.06 Q. mongolica Root 31,056,235 79,747 0 59.44 99.00 95.35
SL.07 Q. serrata Leaf 47,729,808 121,134 0 61.53 99.05 95.37
SP.08 Q. serrata Petiole 39,921,750 110,715 0 54.54 99.30 96.63
ST.09 Q. serrata Twig 45,102,554 118,695 0 59.18 99.12 95.68
SB.10 Q. serrata Branch 42,153,555 117,148 0 56.64 99.24 96.29
SS.11 Q. serrata Stem 43,534,842 115,772 0 58.31 99.15 95.97
SR.12 Q. serrata Root 53,601,813 136,099 0 61.45 99.01 95.18

aThe percentage of ambiguous bases (N) in sequence reads.

bThe GC content percentage in sequence reads.

cThe percentage of bases in which the phred quality score (Q score) is above 20.

dThe percentage of bases in which Q score is above 30.