Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Mar 2;33(10):e14113. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14113

Table 1.

Studies that have compared the EGJ-CI among patient and control populations. Methods of EGJ-CI computation in instances of LES-CD separation were not uniform among these studies, with some including and some excluding the CD component. Functional patients were defied as having reflux symptoms, but normal physiological studies.

Median [IQR] EGJ-CI in mmHg•cm
Study Control Subjects GERD Functional
Nicodème 2014 39 [25–55] n=75 18* [8–30] n=7 45 [23–67] n=45
Tolone 2015 ----- 11* [3–21] n=91 22 [10–41] n=39
Jasper 2016 63 [50–90] n=63 50* [28–70] n=116 -----
Wang 2016 35 [26–58] n=21 30* [15–53] n=68 -----
Xie 2017 63 [38–83] n=21 22* [20–31] n=39
26* [15–38] n=38§
30* [19–44]
Ham 2017 67 [27–79] n=23 28* [4–63] n=25
26* [15–32] n=16§
51 [3–153]
*

p<0.05 vs controls or comparator;

esophagitis patients;

§

Non-erosive reflux disease;

non-GERD