Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;36(8):109588. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109588

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Validation of the conditional-inducible Zeb1 knockout model

(A) Breeding strategy to generate inducible control and Zeb1 knockout mice with endogenous tdTOM reporter expression.

(B) Tamoxifen (TAM) was administered daily for 5 consecutive days. Tissue was harvested at the indicated time points post-induction (black arrows).

(C) Induction of tdTOM in GFAP+ RGL cells was comparable in both models.

(D) Representative image depicting overlap of tdTOM in GFAP+ RGL cells within the SGZ.

(E) Representative images showing RGL cells are ZEB1+ in control mice (arrow), but ZEB1 following TAM administration in Zeb1−/− mice (arrow).

(F) Quantification of ZEB1 expression in GFAP+tdTOM+ RGL cells in the SGZ of control and Zeb1−/− mice 1 day post-induction.

(G) Comparison of ZEB1-expressing RGL cells at 4 weeks post-induction in control, Zeb1+/−, and Zeb1−/− mice.

Dots represent individual mice (minimum of two sections analyzed per animal); numerical data are shown as mean ± SEM. Scale bars: 100 μm (D); 20 μm (F); 10 μm (insets).