Skip to main content
. 2000 Jan 24;2000(1):CD001987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001987.pub2

6. Laser vs. TURP Baseline and Follow‐up Peak Urinary Flow rate (mL/s).

Study Mean baseline score Mean follow‐up/ 6 mo Mean follow‐up/ 1 yr
Anson 
 Laser 
 TURP 9.5 
 10.0 15.6 
 19.9 (p = 0.037) 15.4 
 21.8 (p = 0.009)
Costello 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.8 
 9.5 15.8 
 19.1 (p = NS) NA 
 NA
Cowles 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.9 (3.6) [SD] 
 9.5 (3.2) NA 
 NA 14.2 
 16.5 (p = NS)
Donovan 
 Laser 
 TURP 10.4 (2.9) 
 10.3 (2.7) 7.5 months 
 16.2 
 20.0 (p < 0.05) NA 
 NA
Gujral 
 Laser 
 TURP 11.2 (5.3) 
 8.5 (3.6) 7.5 months 
 16.9 
 17.0 (p = NS) NA 
 NA
Kabalin 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.5 (1.1) [SE] 
 9.0 (1.1) 20.5 (1.8) 
 22.9 (2.8) 21.6 (1.5) 
 21.6 (2.2)
Sengor 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.7 (2.3) 
 8.4 (2.8) 18.2 (2.1) 
 19.8 (2.5) NA 
 NA
Suvakovic (Non‐contact) 
 Laser 
 TURP 10.5 (3.7) 
 11.1 (6.4) 16.2 (4.2) 
 19.0 (0.8) (p = NS) 12.6 (3.7) 
 15.2 (2.7) (p = NS)
Gilling 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.9 (3.0) 
 9.1 (3.2) 23.9 (8.7) 
 22.4 (9.0) (p = NS) 25.2 (11.9) 
 20.4 (8.5) (p = NS)
Mottet 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.5 
 7.7 17.5 
 16.6 (p = NS) 19.3 
 17.6 (p = NS)
Keoghane 
 Laser 
 TURP 11.8 (4.5) 
 11.4 (5.0) NA 
 NA 17.1 (13.2) 
 21.2 (12.4) (p = NS)
Shingleton 
 Laser 
 TURP 7.6 (3.4) 
 6.5 (4.0) 15.8 (6.9) 
 16.3 (6.4) (p = NS) 15.4 (4.9) 
 16.7 (7.6) (p = NS)
Suvakovic (Contact) 
 Laser 
 TURP 12.2 (3.8) 
 11.1 (6.4) 18.7 (7.5) 
 19.0 (8.0 (p = NS) 25.3 (5.9) 
 15.2 (2.7) (p = NS)
Tukhanen (Contact) 
 Laser 
 TURP 9.0 (3.8) 
 8.2 (3.2) 17.9 (7.1) 
 21.1 (9.7) (p = NS) NA 
 NA
Zorn (Contact) 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.7 
 9.0 20.0 
 23.1 (p = NS) 20.0 
 26.9 (p = NS)
Carter 
 Laser 
 TURP 9.5 
 10.0 18.5 
 19.0 (p = NS) 18.0 
 19.5 (p = NS)
Suvakovic (Hybrid) 
 Laser 
 TURP 11.8 (4.1) 
 11.1 (6.4) 19.4 (3.4) 
 19.0 (0.8) NA 
 NA
Tukhanen (Hybrid) 
 Laser 
 TURP 8.5 
 7.2 14.4 
 19.6 (p = NS) NA 
 NA
Zorn (Hybrid) 
 Laser 
 TURP 6.2 
 9.0 28.2 
 23.1 (p = NS) 20.5 
 26.9