Skip to main content
. 2000 Jan 24;2000(1):CD001987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001987.pub2

Tuhkanen 1999b.

Methods CONTACT LASER. 
 Tissue effect: coagulation and vaporization. 
 Subjects blinded: Unclear
Participants N=50 
 Country/Region: Finland 
 Mean age: 67 
 (range 56‐77) 
 Race: unknown 
 Not available to follow‐up: 2 (4%)
Interventions 1. Laser group (contact and vaporization) (n=25 ) Nd‐YAG laser settings; 40 watts. 
 2. TURP (n=25): 
 Catheter protocol: no 
 Routine antibiotics (preop): yes 
 Mean average of follow‐up: 6 months
Outcomes Danish PSS‐1; PUF; RV; Prostate size; Hospital length of stay; Rehospitalization/re‐operation; Adverse events.
Notes Inclusion criteria: 
 Prostate volume 40‐100 cc. Urodynamic evidence of obstruction; voiding detrusor pressure >40 cm H2O or slope detrusor pressure/urine flow >2 cm H20 mL/s.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear