Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;12:686661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686661

Table 4.

Comparisons of affective valence at four time points within exercise modalities.

Tp ΔM SE p
MICE t1 vs. t0 0.250 0.107 0.119
t2 vs. t0 0.233 0.126 0.390
t3 vs. t0 0.422 0.144 0.021**
t2 vs. t1 −0.017 0.090 >0.999
t3 vs. t1 0.172 0.114 0.791
t3 vs. t2 0.190 0.132 0.913
VICE t1 vs. t0 −0.441 0.109 <0.001***
t2 vs. t0 −0.946 0.129 <0.001***
t3 vs. t0 −0.468 0.147 0.009***
t2 vs. t1 −0.505 0.092 <0.001***
t3 vs. t1 −0.027 0.117 >0.999
t3 vs. t2 0.477 0.135 0.003***
HIIE t1 vs. t0 −0.327 0.108 0.016**
t2 vs. t0 −0.602 0.128 <0.001***
t3 vs. t0 0.558 0.146 0.001***
t2 vs. t1 −0.274 0.092 0.018**
t3 vs. t1 0.885 0.116 <0.001***
t3 vs. t2 1.159 0.134 <0.001***

The results represent pairwise post-hoc comparisons of Feeling Scale (FS) values for the 4 points in time (Tp: pre-exercise [t0], in-task [t1, t2], and post-exercise [t3]; Model 2). MICE, moderate-intensity continuous exercise; VICE, vigorous-intensity continuous exercise; HIIE, high-intensity interval exercise.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001 (Bonferroni adjusted).