Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 11;32(1):131–142. doi: 10.1111/jar.12515

Table 4.

Linear regression analysis (n = 60) on physical activity outcomes analysed with use of McGarty's cut‐points

Steps per day Counts per minute Minutes MVPA
B SE B β p Adj R 2 B SE B β p Adj R 2 B SE B β p Adj R 2
Model 1
 Intercept 9,633 1,168 13% 1,304 212 0% 134.4 21.5 4%
 Sex (0 = boy; 1 = girl) 1,770 682 −0.33 0.01 61 124 −0.07 0.62 −20.2 12.5 −0.21 0.11
 Age (year) −95 80 −0.15 0.24 −15 15 −0.14 0.32 −2.3 1.5 −0.21 0.13
 Adaptive behaviour (year)6 359 213 0.22 0.10 −15 39 −0.06 0.69 3.4 3.9 0.12 0.38
 DS (0 = no DS; 1 = DS) 1,567 779 −0.25 0.049 −12 141 −0.01 0.93 4.6 14.3 0.04 0.75
Model 2
 Intercept −1,111 3,414 26% −588 623 12% −34.4 64.4 15%
 Sex (0 = boy; 1 = girl) −715 703 −0.13 0.31 125 128 0.14 0.33 −3.7 13.3 −0.04 0.78
 Age (year) −54 75 −0.09 0.48 −7 14 −0.07 0.59 −1.6 1.4 −0.15 0.25
 Adaptive behaviour (year)6 −77 236 −0.05 0.74 92 43 −0.34 0.04 −3.4 4.5 −0.12 0.44
 DS (0 = no DS; 1 = DS) −1,098 730 −0.18 0.14 70 133 0.07 0.60 12.0 13.8 0.11 0.39
 Motor development (score) 167 50 0.49 <0.01 29 9 0.52 <0.01 2.7 0.9 0.44 <0.01

DS, down syndrome. The bold values represent the significant values in the regression models.

a

As continuous indicator of level of intellectual disability.