Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;31(4):e12958. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12958

TABLE 1.

Comparison between common scWGA techniques

Amplification strategy Uniformity Coverage Error rate
DOP‐PCR Exponential graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g003.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g006.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g004.jpg
MDA Exponential graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g006.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g003.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g006.jpg
MALBAC Semi‐linear graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g003.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g003.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g003.jpg
LIANTI Linear graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g004.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g004.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g006.jpg
PTA Linear graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g004.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g004.jpg graphic file with name BPA-31-e12958-g006.jpg

Number of upward arrows reflects assay reliability in each represented category; one arrow depicts least and three arrows represents most reliable.