Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Jul 31;13(7):e16788. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16788

Ki-67 and Its Relation With Complete Pathological Response in Patients With Breast Cancer

Sana Wajid 1,, Fauzia A Samad 1, Abdus S Syed 2, Faiza Kazi 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8412210  PMID: 34513395

Abstract

Introduction

Ki-67 is a nuclear antigen present in the synthesis phase of the cell cycle. Studies have shown that a high value of Ki-67 results in greater response to chemotherapy with higher incidence of complete pathological response, which ultimately results in improved overall survival.

Methods and materials

The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of high Ki-67 levels in breast cancer patients and to find the correlation of complete pathological response in breast cancer with Ki-67 levels. It is a descriptive case series with a correlational study design done at Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawalpindi. Eighty patients with locally advanced breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery were recruited. Their Ki-67 levels were determined on trucut biopsy. Pathological response in the post-op sample was correlated with Ki-67 levels.

Results

The results showed 27 (33%) patients out of the 80 had high Ki-67 values. Among them 17 (63%) had complete pathological response, seven (26%) showed partial pathological response whereas three (11%) had disease progression. In contrast, out of the 53 patients having low Ki-67 values, only nine (17%) had complete pathological response, 31 (58%) showed partial pathological response and 13 (25%) had progressive disease. A Chi-square test was applied which showed significant correlation between Ki-67 and complete pathological response, with a p value of 0.00018.

Conclusion

Therefore high Ki-67 values in patients with breast cancer correlated well with attainment of complete pathological response. We can incorporate Ki-67 in the initial clinical assessment of breast cancer patients to help predict effectiveness as well as response to chemotherapy.

Keywords: ki-67, breast cancer

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women across the world. With the advent of new treatment strategies and a multidisciplinary approach, 70 to 80% of patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer are being cured. Of those who have locally advanced or metastatic disease, targeted therapy has played a remarkable role in improving the quality of life as well as overall survival [1,2].

Many new ongoing trials are looking into biological markers to better evaluate and categorize individuals who will obtain the maximum benefit from either chemotherapy or targeted therapy or both in early as well as advanced-stage disease.

Some of the most astounding examples in front of us are estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and Her2/Neu receptors whose response to hormonal and targeted therapy has immensely changed the treatment approach and has improved survival rates significantly [3-6].

It is because of these results that many other biological markers are being looked into so that further understanding of the disease, as well as individualization of treatment options, can take place.

Some of the markers currently under investigation are TP53, Bcl-2 and Ki-67. Out of these biological markers, Ki-67 is of particular interest [7-9].

Ki-67 is a nuclear antigen discovered in 1980. It is expressed in active phases of the cell cycle G1, S, G2 and M phase and is absent in the quiescent phase (G0). It can be used to assess the growth fraction of a certain cell population. It can, therefore, be called a “proliferative marker of the cells” [10].

Numerous studies evaluating the percentage of Ki-67 in tumor cells and response to chemotherapy have been conducted in different malignancies such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, bladder cancer, endometrial cancer, cervical cancers, neuroendocrine tumors and sarcomas [11-13]. These studies have shown that the greater the percentage of Ki-67, the greater is the response to chemotherapy which ultimately leads to improved overall survival.

Studies have also been conducted to evaluate its role in breast cancer. These studies have indicated that a high percentage of Ki-67 corresponds to a better response in reducing the size or completely eliminating the tumor that leads to increase in survival [14-16].

The definition of complete pathological response is resolution of invasive carcinoma in both breast tissue as well as in the lymph nodes resected in the histopathology specimen of Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) [5,17]. It plays a significant role in increasing disease-free survival in breast cancer patients and also has a potential role in the improvement of long-term survival as indicated by various studies [18].

Despite the numerous published papers evaluating the predictive significance of Ki-67, it is still not considered as a validated marker to be used in clinical practice as most of the studies are retrospective and small. Therefore a definite need was felt for a prospective study with sufficient number to identify any significant statistical difference. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the potential of Ki-67 in predicting response to chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings. The study results can identify patients who would respond to chemotherapy early on in the treatment and thus should be subjected to rigorous chemotherapy to achieve a complete pathological response before surgery. This may translate into improved survival. Moreover, on the other hand, identification of poor responders to chemotherapy can help us decide and plan about early surgical interventions and incorporation of targeted therapies in the neoadjuvant regimens. This later decision becomes more important in a developing country like Pakistan, which has less financial resources and a high burden of breast cancer disease.

Materials and methods

Study design

This is a descriptive case series of 80 stage III breast cancer patients conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The duration of the study was one year, starting from January 20, 2017, till January 21, 2018. This study included female patients of histologically proven cancer of the breast aged between 18 to 65 years. All of them had stage III disease with a good performance status and normal lab results and ECHO. Pregnant patients were excluded from the study 

Method

Eighty patients having locally advanced cancer were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient department of Oncology at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, from January 2017 till January 2018. Informed consent was taken from all the patients.

Patients underwent trucut biopsy of their breast lump to confirm their diagnosis of breast cancer. They also underwent staging workup to rule out distant metastasis which included blood complete picture, liver function tests, renal function tests, echocardiography and computed tomography scans of chest and upper abdomen with contrast enhancement.

Tumor block samples obtained from the trucut biopsy were evaluated for the levels Ki-67 at the histopathology department of Fauji Foundation Hospital using immunohistochemistry technique. The tumor samples were also routinely assessed for estrogen progesterone and Her2/neu receptors.

Before the start of chemotherapy, the primary breast tumor size and the axillary lymph nodes' status were clinically determined and recorded. All patients underwent six cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy and their tumor size was clinically evaluated after every two cycles and at the end of chemotherapy before surgery.

After the completion of chemotherapy patients were referred to the surgical department of Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi. Patients underwent modified radical mastectomy and their samples were sent to the histopathological department of Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, for evaluation of any residual tumor. The pathological response of chemotherapy in histopathology report of MRM was compared with the levels of Ki-67 obtained from the trucut biopsy of the patients.

The cut-off value of Ki-67 was taken as 35% with high Ki-67 being more than 35%.

Data analysis

Data was entered and analyzed in SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables like age, tumor size and percentage of Ki-67. Frequency and percentage were calculated for qualitative variables like gender, lymph node, stage and pathological complete response.

Chi-squared test was used to compute the association between high percentage of ki-67 and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Ki-67 values were measured in the trucut biopsy samples of the patients and their response to chemotherapy was determined from the histopathology report after they underwent modified radical mastectomy.

Descriptive statistics of age (years) and tumor size (cm) were also calculated in terms of mean and standard deviation. The mean age in this study was 52.16 + 8.76 and the mean clinical tumor size (cm) was 7.71 + 3.88 (Table 1).

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of tumor size (cm) and age (years).

  Mean Std. Deviation
Tumor Size (cm) 7.71 3.88
Age (years) 52.16 8.76

The percentage of low Ki-67 was higher as compared to the percentage of high Ki-67 in the study population. Fifty-three patients out of 80 patients had low Ki-67 values which made up around 66.3% of the total sample size, whereas 27 patients out of 80 patients had high Ki-67 values which made up around 33.8% of the total sample size as shown in Table 2

Table 2. Distribution of Ki-67 value in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Ki-67 Frequency Percentage
LOW(≤35) 53 66.3
HIGH(>35) 27 33.8
Total 80 100

Distribution of response of chemotherapy as evaluated from the histopathology report was also calculated in terms of frequency and percentage of the patients with complete pathological response, partial pathological response and progression of the disease. It was shown that 26 (32.5%) patients out of 80 had a complete pathological response whereas 38 (47.5%) patients out of 80 had a partial pathological response and 16 (20%) out of 80 had progression of the disease as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Distribution of response of chemotherapy as evaluated from the histopathology report.

Response Frequency Percentage
Complete pathological response 26 32.5
Partial Pathological response 38 47.5
Progression of disease 16 20.0
Total 80 100

The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of high values of Ki-67 in locally advanced breast cancer patients and to compare the frequency of complete pathological response with low and high values of Ki-67. The outcome of this objective was that 27 patients out of the 80 had high Ki-67 value and 17 out of them achieved a complete pathological response, with seven having a partial pathological response whereas only three had progression of the disease with high Ki-67 values.

In contrast out of the 53 patients having a low Ki-67 value only nine had complete pathological response, with 31 resulting in a partial pathological response and 13 of the 53 patients ended up having progression of the disease. Chi-square test was applied to compare the frequency of complete pathological response with high and low values of Ki- 67 which came as significant with a p-value of 0.00018 as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Frequency of complete pathological response with low and high values of Ki-67.

Percentage of Ki-67 Total Cases Response P-value
    Complete Pathological response (pCR) Partial pathological response (pPR) Progression (PD)       0.00018
≤35% (low) 53 9 31 13
>35% (high) 27 17 7 3
Total 80 26 38 16

Effect modifiers like age were stratified and compared with the response of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. It was seen that out of 27 patients who were less than 45 years of age, 12 had complete pathological response and partial pathological response each whereas three patients had progression of the disease. In patients who were equal to or more than 45 years of age, 14 had complete pathological response whereas 26 had partial pathological response, while 13 patients had progression of the disease. Chi square test was applied to identify any positive correlation between the age and the pathological responses and it was insignificant with a p-value of 0.1 as shown in Table 5 below.

Table 5. Effect modifier like age was stratified and compared with the response of chemotherapy.

  AGE RESPONSE   P-value
Complete Pathological response (pCR) Partial Pathological Response (pPR) Progression (PD) Total
<45 12 12 3 27     0.1
≥45 14 26 13 53
Total 26 38 16 80

Effect modifier like tumor size was stratified and compared with the responses of chemotherapy. The tumor size was divided into two categories with the size starting from 1 cm to going till 20 cm. It was seen that out of the 69 patients with the clinical tumor size of 1-10 cm, 22 had a complete pathological response while 35 had a partial pathological response, whereas 12 had progression of the disease. Out of the 11 patients who had a tumor size between 11-20 cm, four patients had a complete pathological response, while three had a partial pathological response whereas four had progression of the disease. Chi square test was applied to compare tumor size with response which came as insignificant with a p-value of 0.24 as shown in Table 6. All patients had Stage III disease so stage was not stratified.

Table 6. Effect modifier like tumor size was stratified and compared with the response of chemotherapy.

Clinical tumor size (cm) Response   P- value
  Complete Pathological Response (pCR) Partial Pathological Response (pPR) Progression (PD) Total
1-10 22 35 12 69   0.24
11-20 4 3 4 11

Stratification with respect to age was done for response of tumor with high and low values of Ki-67 which showed that the total number of patients below the age of 45 years were 27 in which high Ki-67 was seen in 10 and low Ki-67 was seen in 17 of the patients. Among the patients with high Ki-67, eight had complete pathological response which was statistically significant. The total number of patients who were 45 years or above was 53 of which 17 had a high Ki-67 value and 36 had a low Ki-67 value. Among those with high Ki-67, nine had complete pathological response which was also statistically significant. Therefore it can be inferred that Ki-67 was an independent predictor of response irrespective of age with a p value of 0.015 in patients below 45 years of age and a p value of 0.01 for patients above 45 years as shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Stratification with respect to age for response with High and low values of Ki-67.

Age Ki 67 % PCR PPR PD Total p-value
  <45 High 8 2 0 10   0.015
Low 4 10 3 17
  >45 High 9 5 3 17   0.010
Low 5 21 10 36
Total   26 38 16 80  

Stratification with respect to size was done for response of tumor with high and low values of Ki-67 which showed that the total number of patients with a tumor size of 1-10 cm was 69, in which high Ki-67 was seen in 22 and low Ki-67 was seen in 47. The total number of patients who had a tumor size of 11-20 cm was 11, in which five had a high Ki-67 value and six patients had a low Ki-67 value. Ki-67 relationship with complete pathological response was found out to be statistically significant with a p value of 0.004 for the 1-10 cm tumor size group and a p value of 0.016 for patients who had a size of 11-20 cm as shown in Table 8. It can therefore be inferred that Ki-67 was an independent predictor of response irrespective of size.

Table 8. Stratification with respect to size for response with high and low values of Ki-67.

SIZE Ki67 PCR PPR PD TOTAL P VALUE
  1-10 HIGH 13 6 3 22 0.004
LOW 9 29 9 47
  11-20 HIGH 4 1 0 5 0.016
LOW 0 2 4 6
  Total   26 38 16 80  

Stage was not stratified with response since all the patients in this study had stage III disease.

Hormone receptor status was also evaluated in relation to Ki-67 and response and the results showed that Ki-67 was a significant predictor of response in both hormone receptor positive and negative patients (Tables 9, 10).

Table 9. Relation of Ki-67 and Response in Hormone Receptor Positive Patients.

Hormone Receptor Positive   Complete Response Partial response Progression Total P value
  High Ki-67 8 3 1 12 0.001
  Low Ki-67 3 23 4 30
Total   11 26 5 42

Table 10. Relation of Ki-67 and Response in Hormone Receptor Negative Patients.

Hormone receptor negative   Complete Response Partial response Progression Total P value
  High Ki-67 10 4 2 16 0.036
  Low Ki-67 5 8 9 22
Total   15 12 11 38

Discussion

The evaluation of the prediction of response to chemotherapy in cancer patients has been an area of keen interest for oncologists for the past many years. It helps them in selecting the most effective chemotherapeutic regimen and thus exposing patients to minimal unwanted side effects of toxic drugs.

Many markers such as estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and Her2/Neu receptors have been identified in breast cancer patients which provide guidance to the clinician in the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for them.

Ki-67 has been of particular interest in patients with breast cancer and is under investigation in many clinical trials for the evaluation of its role in the prediction of response to chemotherapy. Although the strong correlation between Ki-67 and response to chemotherapy has been established most of the studies are retrospective. There are no prospective randomized trials for this marker.

Previous studies have evaluated a sample size ranging from 70 to 1000. Mostly the patients recruited for the study had stage II and stage III breast cancer with the tumor size ranging between 2 to 5 cm and only about 4 to 16% of the patients exhibited involvement of the skin or chest wall.

Almost all the studies used Her2/Neu targeted therapy for Her2/Neu positive patients except for the Gepartrio Trial [19].

Our study conducted at the Fauji Foundation Hospital oncology department recruited 80 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. The mean age of the patients recruited in this study was 52.16 with a mean tumor size of 7.7 cm. All the patients recruited in this study had stage III disease with approximately 50% of the patients having a T 4 tumor or clinically positive lymph nodes.

The reason for 50% of our study population comprising locally advanced breast cancer is the lack of breast cancer awareness in most of the rural areas of Pakistan and therefore by the time they reach our hospital setup they have very advanced disease. Also, most of the women opt for modified radical mastectomy as there is lack of surgical expertise in lumpectomy and sentinal lymph node biopsy in many of the surgical centers in Pakistan as well as patients are lost to follow up after they have undergone surgery.

To determine the response of chemotherapy in relation to the value of Ki-67, patients in most of the studies were divided into two groups; one having a high Ki-67 value whereas the other having a low Ki-67 value. However in the Gepartrio trial patients were divided into three groups having high, intermediate and low Ki-67 values [19].

There is no standard cut-off value of Ki-67. Previous studies have either taken an arbitrary cut-off value or have taken the mean of the study population as their cut-off Ki-67 value [20]. Some studies have also taken the Saint Gallens value of Ki-67 which is used to divide luminal A and B cancers as their cut-off value and also there are a few studies that have taken out the optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis [21,22]. The range of cut-off values in these studies varies from 13 to 50% but almost every cut-off value of the studies has shown Ki-67 to be a significant independent predictor of response of chemotherapy [22,23]. Our study took 35% as the cut-off value of Ki-67 in concordance with the Gepartrio trial but due to small sample size we only divided our study population into two groups having a high and low Ki-67 value instead of three groups as was done in the Gepartrio trial. The Gepartrio trial recruited around 11600 patients of which around 30% of the study population having a Ki-67 value of more than 35% showed complete pathological response which was significant with a p value of 0.005 [19]. Another study evaluated 262 patients by analyzing data from four GEICAM clinical trials took >50% as a cut-off value of Ki-67 in neoadjuvant breast cancer settings and showed that 40% of their patients attained complete pathological response who had a Ki-67 value of more than 50% [24]. Our study population of 80 patients showed a complete pathological response of 60% in patients having a Ki-67 value of more than 35% with a significant p value of 0.00018 even though 50% of our study population had T3 and T4 tumors as compared to the Gepartrio trial having a majority of T2 tumors showing that Ki-67 is an independent predictor of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Hormone receptor status was also evaluated in relation to Ki-67 and response in our study and the results were consistenet with the Gepartio trial showing that Ki-67 was a significant factor in determination of response in both hormone receptor positive and hormone receptor negative patients. Hormone receptor negative patients showed an increased percentage of complete pathological response especially in patients with high Ki-67 value [19].

The limitations of our study were that Her2-neu targeted therapy was not used in patients who were Her2/Neu positive and also there was no standard cut-off value of Ki-67. A larger sample size is needed to validate these results.

Conclusions

High Ki-67 values in patients with breast cancer can correlate with attainment of complete pathological response and can be inculcated in the initial clinical assessment of the breast cancer patients to predict the effectiveness of response to chemotherapy and prevent unnecessary side effects in patients who would not respond to chemotherapy. However more prospective randomized trials are needed with a larger sample size to confirm the results. There is also a need to standardize the cut-off value of Ki-67.

Acknowledgments

I'd like to acknowledge my husband's continuous support throughout this journey.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi issued approval NA

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Awareness and current knowledge of breast cancer. Akram M, Iqbal M, Daniyal M, Khan AU. Biol Res. 2017;50:33. doi: 10.1186/s40659-017-0140-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. McDonald ES, Clark AS, Tchou J, Zhang P, Freedman GM. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:9–16. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Advances in the treatment of advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Turner NC, Neven P, Loibl S, Andre F. Lancet. 2017;389:2403–2414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32419-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.ER+ metastatic breast cancer: past, present, and a prescription for an apoptosis-targeted future. Rozeboom B, Dey N, De P. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943351/ Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:2821–2831. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pharmacometabolomics study identifies circulating spermidine and tryptophan as potential biomarkers associated with the complete pathological response to trastuzumab-paclitaxel neoadjuvant therapy in HER-2 positive breast cancer. Miolo G, Muraro E, Caruso D, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27223427/ Oncotarget. 2016;7:39809–39822. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.HERMIONE: a randomized Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, anthracycline-naïve, HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Miller K, Cortes J, Hurvitz SA, et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2385-z. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:352. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2385-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Targeting BCL-2 to enhance vulnerability to therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Merino D, Lok SW, Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Oncogene. 2016;35:1877–1887. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.BH3 mimetics selectively eliminate chemotherapy-induced senescent cells and improve response in TP53 wild-type breast cancer. Shahbandi A, Rao SG, Anderson AY, Frey WD, Olayiwola JO, Ungerleider NA, Jackson JG. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-0564-6. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:3097–3116. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0564-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Assessment of Ki-67 as a potential biomarker in patients with breast cancer. Ragab HM, Samy N, Afify M, El Maksoud NA, Shaaban HM. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.03.002. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2018;16:479–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes of chemoradiation-based bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Koga F, Takemura K, Fukushima H. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19 doi: 10.3390/ijms19092777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ki-67: more hidden behind a 'classic proliferation marker'. Sales Gil R, Vagnarelli P. Trends Biochem Sci. 2018;43:747–748. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ki67 is a biological marker of malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhou Y, Hu W, Chen P, et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572037/ Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Predictive value of serological factors, maximal standardized uptake value and ratio of Ki67 in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Lu J, Wu Y, Li B, et al. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:47. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ki-67 labeling index as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Jain P, Doval DC, Batra U, et al. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49:329–338. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: an update. Penault-Llorca F, Radosevic-Robin N. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28065411/ Pathology. 2017;49:166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ki-67 labeling index is a predictive marker for a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Tao M, Chen S, Zhang X, Zhou Q. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29390540/ Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Haque W, Verma V, Hatch S, Suzanne Klimberg V, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4801-3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170:559–567. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4801-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are significantly associated with better overall survival and disease-free survival in triple-negative but not estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Krishnamurti U, Wetherilt CS, Yang J, Peng L, Li X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2017.01.004. Hum Pathol. 2017;64:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ki67, chemotherapy response, and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Haeberle L, et al. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081974. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:486. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ki67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. Denkert C, Loibl S, Müller BM, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23970015/ Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2786–2793. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry. Inwald EC, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstädter F, Zeman F, Koller M, Gerstenhauer M, Ortmann O. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:539–552. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2560-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Optimal Ki67 cut-off for luminal breast cancer prognostic evaluation: a large case series study with a long-term follow-up. Bustreo S, Osella-Abate S, Cassoni P, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;157:363–371. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3817-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ki-67 as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Kim KI, Lee KH, Kim TR, Chun YS, Lee TH, Park HK. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988341/ J Breast Cancer. 2014;17:40–46. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.High proliferation predicts pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Alba E, Lluch A, Ribelles N, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26786263/ Oncologist. 2016;21:150–155. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES