Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Nanobiomed Res. 2021 May 21;1(8):2100016. doi: 10.1002/anbr.202100016

Figure 5. The redox activity of different formulations on coated stainless-steel wires establishes variance of activity with CONP/alginate coating properties.

Figure 5.

Representative traces of reduction/oxidation curves for wires coated using A) acidic and B) neutral pH CONP assessed via cyclic voltammetry. Dashed lines: Max peak cathodic and anodic currents (as indicated) from uncoated wire. C) Since variations in cerium concentration can affect the peak current, the ratio of reduction peak potential (Ce4+) to oxidation peak potential (Ce3+) was calculated. Two-way and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test:****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05, where * represents differences between groups, Δ compares six-and twelve-layer coatings, and γ compares groups with same alginate MW but varying pH of CONP.