Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 1;41(35):7435–7448. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0183-21.2021

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

ERP analysis of listened and imagined notes. A, Averaged responses for all notes. Significance between listening and imagery responses was computed using a permutation test from the values distributed by participants (p < 0.05). B, Averaged responses for the 20% less and most expected notes in both listening (top) and imagery (bottom) conditions. C, Participant-averaged topographic distributions from the ERP of all notes at least 500 ms away from the metronome.