Table 5.
Results of structural equation model.
| Effect |
P-Value |
Confidence interval | |||||
| Lower 2.5% |
Lower 5% |
Upper 5% |
Upper 2.5% |
||||
| Simple paths | |||||||
| COVID-19 based informational cyberloafing → Job anxiety | .467 | .000 | .295 | .323 | .628 | .662 | |
| COVID-19 based informational cyberloafing → State gratitude | .380 | .000 | .237 | .259 | .516 | .544 | |
| COVID-19 based informational cyberloafing → Perceived meaning of work | .268 | .000 | .133 | .155 | .395 | .421 | |
| Job anxiety → Perceived meaning of work | -.130 | .000 | -.191 | -.182 | -.080 | -.071 | |
| State gratitude → Perceived meaning of work | .299 | .000 | .195 | .213 | .390 | .405 | |
| Perceived meaning of work → Innovation performance |
.623 |
.000 |
.512 |
.529 |
.727 |
.751 |
|
| Effect |
P-Value |
Confidence interval | Proportion in total effects |
||||
| Lower 2.5% |
Lower 5% |
Upper 5% |
Upper 2.5% |
||||
| Indirect effects | |||||||
| COVID-19 based informational cyberloafing → Perceived meaning of work → Innovation performance | .167 | .001 | .153 | .173 | .443 | .476 | 50.45% |
| COVID-19 based informational cyberloafing → Job anxiety → Perceived meaning of work → Innovation performance | -.038 | .003 | -.099 | -.089 | -.019 | -.015 | 11.48% |
| COVID-19 based informational cyberloafing → State gratitude → Perceived meaning of work → Innovation performance | .071 | .000 | .009 | .015 | .122 | .136 | 21.45% |
| Total indirect effects | .200 | .000 | .169 | .187 | .447 | .480 | 60.42% |
| Direct effect | .130 | .012 | .014 | .05 | .382 | .424 | 39.27% |
| Total effect | .331 | .000 | .277 | .313 | .727 | .778 | |
Note. N = 544. Number of bootstrap samples for calculating bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals: 10,000.