Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 2;8:231. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01013-7

Online-only Table 2.

Comparison of analytical performances of LA-ICP-MS systems.

Standard Laboratory Beam Diameter (µm) Ca (µg/g) Rb (µg/g) Sr (µg/g) Y (µg/g) Zr (µg/g) Nb (µg/g) Ba (µg/g) La (µg/g) Ce (µg/g) Pr (µg/g) Nd (µg/g) Sm (µg/g) Eu (µg/g) Gd (µg/g) Tb (µg/g) Dy (µg/g) Ho (µg/g) Er (µg/g) Tm (µg/g) Yb (µg/g) Lu (µg/g) Hf (µg/g) Ta (µg/g) Pb (µg/g) Th (µg/g) U (µg/g)
Comparison 15 µm and 20 µm spotsizes UoB
ATHO-G Jochum et al., 2006 preferred value 12150 65.3 94.1 94.5 512 62.4 547 55.6 121 14.6 60.9 14.2 2.76 15.3 2.51 16.2 3.43 10.3 1.52 10.5 1.54 13.7 3.9 5.67 7.4 2.37
ATHO-G Jochum et al., 2006 preferred value uncertainty 214 3 2.7 3.5 20 2.6 16 1.5 4 0.4 2 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.08 0.7 0.11 0.5 0.07 0.4 0.05 0.5 0.2 0.62 0.27 0.12
ATHO-G UoB 20 mean (n = 13) 12118 62.8 93.2 87.9 477 54.8 532 53.3 117 14.4 57.4 14.1 2.8 14.7 2.4 15.5 3.4 9.9 1.5 10.0 1.5 13.3 3.4 5.2 7.2 2.2
ATHO-G UoB 20 standard deviation 363 0.8 1.6 1.6 21 2.7 8 1.0 3 0.2 2.6 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1
ATHO-G UoB 20 bias mean to preferred value% -0.3% -3.8% -1.0% -7.0% -6.9% -12.1% -3% -4.1% -3% -1.7% -5.7% -0.7% 1.0% -4.2% -4.1% -4.1% -2.0% -4.4% -2.6% -5.0% -4.3% -3.0% -11.8% -8.3% -2.8% -8.3%
ATHO-G UoB 20 relative std. deviation 3.0% 1.2% 1.8% 1.8% 4.3% 4.9% 1% 1.8% 2% 1.6% 4.6% 6.2% 12.1% 5.0% 5.3% 3.2% 5.6% 7.5% 7.1% 5.0% 6.5% 3.7% 3.9% 4.9% 4.2% 4.9%
ATHO-G UoB 15 mean (n = 24) 12578 63.3 90.8 85.7 463 55.4 522 52.0 116 13.8 57.5 13.3 2.5 14.8 2.3 15.2 3.3 9.7 1.5 10.1 1.5 12.5 3.3 5.1 6.9 2.2
ATHO-G UoB 15 standard deviation 2047 3.4 2.8 3.6 23 1.9 22 1.9 3 0.6 3.9 1.5 0.3 2.7 0.3 1.9 0.4 1.8 0.2 1.2 0.2 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.2
ATHO-G UoB 15 bias mean to preferred value% 3.5% -3.1% -3.5% -9.3% -10% -11.1% -5% -6.4% -4% -5.7% -5.6% -6.1% -8.1% -3.1% -6.9% -6.0% -5.1% -6.1% -1.8% -4.1% -5.1% -8.7% -14.7% -10.0% -6.5% -6.2%
ATHO-G UoB 15 relative std. deviation 16.3% 5.4% 3.1% 4.1% 5% 3.5% 4% 3.6% 3% 4.7% 6.7% 11.4% 11.4% 18.4% 11.5% 12.4% 10.8% 18.1% 15.1% 12.3% 13.4% 17.4% 8.9% 12.0% 5.3% 10.3%
ATHO-G bias% mean 20 to 15 µm -3.7% -0.8% 2.6% 2.6% 2.9% -1.1% 2.0% 2.5% 1.2% 4.3% -0.1% 5.9% 9.8% -1.2% 3.0% 2.1% 3.3% 1.9% -0.7% -1.0% 0.9% 6.3% 3.3% 1.9% 4.0% -2.2%
NIST610 Jochum et al., 2011 preferred value 81475 425.7 515.5 462 448 465 452 440 453 448 430 453 447 449 437 437 449 455 435 450 439 435 446 426 457.2 461.5
NIST610 Jochum et al., 2011 preferred value uncertainty 1429 1 1 11 9 34 9 10 8 7 8 11 12 12 9 11 12 14 10 9 8 12 33 1 1 1
NIST610 UoB 20 mean (n = 38) 83769 436.7 524.3 472 457 480 463 455 468 467 443 470 461 458 458 448 464 465 444 471 458 445 465 435 474.0 476.7
NIST610 UoB 20 standard deviation 3685 25.9 36.4 33 36 33 32 36 34 39 42 37 33 39 34 46 39 40 32 35 39 45 40 41 41.8 37.2
NIST610 UoB 20 bias mean to preferred value% 2.8% 2.6% 1.7% 2.2% 2.1% 3.3% 2.5% 3.5% 3.3% 4.3% 3.0% 3.7% 3.2% 2.0% 4.8% 2.5% 3.3% 2.3% 2.2% 4.7% 4.3% 2.4% 4.3% 2.1% 3.7% 3.3%
NIST610 UoB 20 relative std. deviation 4.4% 5.9% 6.9% 7.0% 7.8% 6.9% 6.8% 8.0% 7.3% 8.4% 9.4% 7.9% 7.2% 8.5% 7.5% 10.3% 8.3% 8.6% 7.1% 7.5% 8.6% 10.2% 8.7% 9.3% 8.8% 7.8%
NIST610 UoB 15 mean (n = 31) 81850 433.0 514.7 460 444 478 455 441 460 450 434 447 453 440 442 436 449 441 434 463 435 457 452 422 459.6 463.7
NIST610 UoB 15 standard deviation 3348 22.5 13.7 12 23 14 20 9 14 15 16 17 22 19 14 15 14 31 12 27 14 88 13 15 12.9 14.2
NIST610 UoB 15 bias mean to preferred value% 0.5% 1.7% -0.1% -0.4% -1% 3% 1% 0.1% 2% 0.4% 1% -1% 1% -2% 1% -0.1% 0.1% -3% -0.2% 3% -1% 5% 1% -1% 0.5% 0.5%
NIST610 UoB 15 relative std. deviation 4.1% 5.2% 2.7% 2.6% 5.1% 3.0% 4.3% 2.1% 3.0% 3.2% 3.7% 3.8% 4.8% 4.3% 3.2% 3.5% 3.1% 7.1% 2.9% 5.7% 3.3% 19.3% 2.9% 3.6% 2.8% 3.1%
NIST610 UoB bias% mean 20 to 15 µm 2.3% 0.9% 1.8% 2.7% 3.0% 0.3% 1.7% 3.3% 1.6% 3.9% 2.0% 5.0% 1.8% 4.0% 3.6% 2.6% 3.3% 5.6% 2.4% 1.7% 5.3% -2.6% 2.8% 3.1% 3.1% 2.8%
Comparison University of Bonn // iCRAG Trinity College Dublin
StHs6_80-G Jochum et al., 2006 preferred value 37736 30.7 482 11.4 118 6.94 298 12.0 26.1 3.20 13.0 2.78 0.953 0.371 2.22 0.420 1.18 0.172 1.13 0.168 3.07 0.420 10.3 2.28 1.01
StHs6_80-G Jochum et al., 2006 preferred value uncertainty 643 1.7 8 0.4 3 0.25 9 0.3 0.7 0.06 0.3 0.05 0.022 0.09 0.011 0.06 0.011 0.04 0.007 0.03 0.006 0.09 0.015 0.9 0.07 0.04
StHs6_80-G UoB 20 + 15 mean (n = 28) 34529 29.1 443 10.2 105 5.86 274 10.8 23.3 2.88 11.6 2.59 0.770 3.00 0.384 2.12 0.398 1.29 0.164 1.01 0.177 2.61 0.374 8.2 2.05 0.86
StHs6_80-G UoB 20 + 15 standard deviation 3149 1.8 13.25 0.83 8.00 0.59 13.18 0.74 1.00 0.27 1.82 0.64 0.25 1.38 0.19 0.53 0.12 0.54 0.20 0.59 0.10 0.84 0.13 0.89 0.23 0.15
StHs6_80-G UoB 20 + 15 bias mean to preferred value% -8.5% -5.3% -8.1% -10.1% -11.4% -15.6% -8.2% -10.3% -10.9% -10.0% -10.4% -6.7% -19.2% 15.7% 3.5% -4.3% -5.2% 9.7% -4.6% -10.8% 5.1% -14.9% -10.9% -20.2% -10.2% -14.5%
StHs6_80-G UoB 20 + 15 RSD% 9.1% 6.3% 3.0% 8.1% 7.7% 10.1% 4.8% 6.9% 4.3% 9.5% 15.6% 24.5% 33.0% 46.1% 49.3% 25.1% 30.6% 42.1% 124.8% 58.8% 55.7% 32.2% 34.6% 10.8% 11.4% 17.6%
StHs6_80-G iCRAG TCD 18 mean (n = 19) 31.0 490 10.5 112 6.84 313 11.9 26.2 3.04 12.9 2.81 0.931 2.41 2.05 1.12 1.08 2.73 0.403 2.20 1.01
StHs6_80-G iCRAG TCD 18 standard deviation 1.58 18.32 0.73 5.39 0.35 14.35 0.74 1.74 0.14 0.43 0.20 0.05 0.15 0.19 0.11 0.12 0.21 0.04 0.15 0.09
StHs6_80-G iCRAG TCD 18 bias mean to preferred value% 1.0% 2% -7.7% -5% -1.4% 5% -0.6% 0.5% -5.0% -0.8% 1.3% -2.3% -6.9% -7.6% -5.5% -4.3% -11.0% -3.9% -3.5% -0.5%
StHs6_80-G iCRAG TCD 18 relative std. deviation 5.1% 4% 6.9% 5% 5.0% 5% 6.2% 6.6% 4.5% 3.3% 7.3% 5.7% 6.2% 9.1% 9.5% 10.7% 7.8% 9.5% 6.9% 8.6%
bias% UoB to iCRAG TCD -6.3% -10% -2.6% -7% -14.3% -13% -9.7% -11.4% -5.3% -9.7% -7.9% -17.3% 24.2% 3.6% 16.0% -6.8% -4.4% -7.2% -6.9% -14.1%
ATHO-G Jochum et al., 2006 preferred value 12150 65.3 94.1 94.5 512 62.4 547 55.6 121 14.6 60.9 14.2 2.76 15.3 2.51 16.2 3.43 1.52 10.5 1.54 13.7 3.9 5.67 7.4 2.37
ATHO-G Jochum et al., 2006 preferred value uncertainty 214 3.0 2.7 3.5 20 2.6 16 1.5 4 0.4 2.0 0.4 0.10 0.7 0.08 0.7 0.11 0.5 0.07 0.4 0.05 0.5 0.2 0.62 0.3 0.12
ATHO-G UoB 20 + 15 mean (n = 37) 12445 63.2 91.6 86.5 468 55.4 525 52.4 116 13.9 57.4 13.6 2.64 14.8 2.36 15.3 3.29 9.7 1.49 10.1 1.47 12.8 3.4 5.1 7.0 2.20
ATHO-G UoB 20 + 15 std. deviation 1677 2.8 2.7 3.2 23 2.3 19 1.7 3 0.6 3.5 1.4 0.33 2.2 0.23 1.6 0.31 1.5 0.19 1.0 0.17 1.8 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.20
ATHO-G UoB 20 + 15 bias mean to preferred value% 2.4% -3.2% -2.6% -8.5% -8.7% -11.2% -4.0% -5.7% -3.9% -4.5% -5.7% -4.5% -4.5% -3.1% -5.8% -5.3% -4.0% -5.5% -1.8% -4.2% -4.7% -6.9% -13.8% -9.2% -5.7% -7.1%
ATHO-G UoB 20 + 15 relative std. deviation 13% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 6% 10% 12% 15% 10% 10% 9% 15% 13% 10% 11% 14% 8% 10% 5% 9%
ATHO-G iCRAG TCD 18 mean (n = 20) 66.0 97.0 88.3 495 61.0 570 56.2 125.0 14.9 62.3 14.7 2.70 14.2 16.2 9.7 10.1 12.8 3.9 7.38 2.36
ATHO-G iCRAG TCD 18 std. deviation 3.2 6.2 7.1 31 2.2 35 3.9 7.9 0.9 3.6 1.2 0.18 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.8 1.2 0.3 0.52 0.11
ATHO-G iCRAG TCD 18 bias mean to preferred value% 1.0% 3.1% -6.6% -3% -2.3% 4% 1.1% 3% 2.1% 2.4% 3.8% -2.1% -7.2% -0.1% -5.4% -3.8% -6.8% -0.8% -0.27% -0.50%
ATHO-G iCRAG TCD 18 relative std. deviation 4.8% 6.4% 8.0% 6% 3.6% 6% 6.9% 6% 6.1% 5.7% 8.1% 6.8% 7.5% 7.5% 9.6% 8.3% 9.4% 6.9% 7% 5%
bias% UoB to iCRAG TCD -3.4% -4.9% 0.2% -4.6% -9.5% -8.0% -6.1% -6.9% -6.2% -7.4% -7.1% -1.8% 5.4% -3.1% 2.4% 1.7% 2.4% -13.8% -3.9% -6.2%

The upper part of the table shows a comparison of secondary standard values measured using different spot sizes during analytical sessions at the University of Bonn (UoB). The mean values for measurements of ATHO-G57 and NIST61040 are given for analyses performed using 20 and 15 µm laser spot sizes and are compared with the recommended standard values. For each standard, the percentwise difference (bias%) between the 20 µm spot size relative to the 15 µm spot size results is given. The second part of the table shows a comparison of the general analytical performance of the LA-ICP-MS systems of the UoB and the iCRAG TCD laboratories based on results obtained for secondary standards ATHO-G and StHs6_80-G57. Individual laboratory results are compared with the respective recommended values and a percentwise difference (bias%) between the UoB results relative to the iCRAG TCD results is given.