Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 2;4:1033. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02535-x

Table 2.

Neuroimaging regression analyses: results of between-group comparisons.

Region X mm Y mm Z mm # Voxels T p
Regression with STR baseline GABA+
Main effect of practice
[Control-SCR]
 No suprathreshold clusters
[SCR-Control]
Hippocampus −18 −24 −10  31 3.13 0.031
Modulation by speed of performance
 No suprathreshold clusters
Regression with HC baseline GABA+
Main effect of practice
[Control-SCR]
 No suprathreshold clusters
[SCR-Control]
Hippocampus 28 −36 0  30 2.98 0.031
Modulation by speed of performance
 No suprathreshold clusters
Regression with ΔGABA+ STR
Main effect of practice
[Control-SCR]
Hippocampus −20 −14 −20  79 3.42 0.015
[SCR-Control]
 No suprathreshold clusters
Modulation by speed of performance
[Control-SCR]
 No suprathreshold clusters
[SCR-Control]
Putamen 20 14 6  218 3.39 0.016
 (extending to caudate)
Regression with ΔGABA+ HC
 No suprathreshold clusters

Significance level set at pcorr < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons (FWE) over small volumes. All results survived Holm–Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Due to missing fMRI data, one control participant was not included in the regressions with HC GABA+: N control = 23, N SCR = 22. Regressions with STR GABA+: N control = 26, N SCR = 26.

ΔGABA+ post intervention/learning minus baseline, HC hippocampus, STR striatum, SCR stress cortisol responders.