. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 17.

Published in final edited form as: Cerebellum. 2021 Mar 3;20(6):823–835. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01241-y

Table 2.

Results of group comparisons in temporal variability of FC between seven large-scale networks and the cerebellum

Network	Controls mean (SD)	AUD mean (SD)	F _1,31	p value (FDR)	η _p ²
DMN	0.76(0.03)	0.77(0.046)	0.14	0.71	0.005
FPN	0.71(0.055)	0.76(0.046)	7.01	0.028	0.18
RN	0.82(0.036)	0.82(0.048)	0.7	0.45	0.02
DAN	0.77(0.04)	0.76(0.07)	0.72	0.45	0.02
VAN	0.79(0.04)	0.82(0.052)	7.34	0.028	0.19
SN	0.8(0.035)	0.82(0.045)	1.28	0.45	0.04
CON	0.8(0.033)	0.81(0.027)	0.93	0.45	0.03

AUD alcohol use disorder, SD standard deviation, FDR false discovery rate, F F-statistic, η_p² partial eta-squared effect size, DMN default mode network, FPN fronto-parietal network, RN reward network, DAN dorsal attention network, VAN ventral attention network, SN salience network, CON cingulo-opercular network

Bold indicates significant between-group difference