Table 1.
Effect of DN1p manipulations on free-running circadian rhythms
| Group | n | % Rhythmic | Period | Power | Amplitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DN1p Flip-In | 108 | 95.37 | 23.64 ± 0.03 | 865.8 ± 43.0 | 2.22 ± 0.07∗ |
| >mCherry>Kir2.1eGFP no FLP control | 97 | 97.94 | 23.48 ± 0.02 | 1544.3 ± 64.6 | 3.41 ± 0.09 |
| >mCherry>Kir2.1eGFP no GAL4 control | 94 | 97.87 | 23.60 ± 0.03 | 977.08 ± 56.3 | 2.71 ± 0.08 |
| DN1p Flip-Out | 104 | 2.88 | NA | 216.2 ± 10.9∗∗∗∗ | NA |
| >Kir2.1eGFP>mCherry no FLP | 99 | 1.01 | NA | 260.5 ± 12.7∗∗∗∗ | NA |
| >Kir2.1eGFP>mCherry no GAL4 control | 73 | 96.77 | 23.57 ± 0.04 | 867.9 ± 49.3 | 2.56 ± 0.07 |
Numbers given for period, power and amplitude are means ± SEM.
∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 compared to all 3 control lines, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test following one-way ANOVA.