Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 21;13:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100116

Table 1.

Comparison of performance among symmetric FDI systems, including SEC, ASAR, and the percent salt removed from the initial concentration of each study. MHCF compounds denote different Prussian blue analogue materials using a certain inactive transition metal M in its lattice, while AEM and CEM denote anion and cation exchange membranes, respectively. Values in parentheses indicate those obtained at optimal thermodynamic energy efficiency (TEE), whereas the remaining values are shown for those obtained at maximum salt removal.

SEC (kJ/mol) ASAR (µmol/cm2-min) Influent salinity (mM) Diluate salinity (mM) % Salt Removal Active material and separator Other comments Ref. no.
10.9 (5.7) 0.51 (0.53) 100 10 (20) 90 (80) NiHCF/AEM /NiHCF parallel flow-through; recirculating this work
7.16 0.46 200 96 52 NiHCF/AEM/NiHCF parallel flow-through; recirculating this work
18.0 2.73 100 73 27 NiHCF/AEM /NiHCF parallel flow-through (Reale et al., 2019)
10.1 0.45 20 17.5 12.5 carbon/CEM /carbon transverse flow-through; carbon cloth modified with silane groups (Arulrajan et al., 2019)
6.44 0.31 477 286.2 40 NiHCF/AEM /FeHCF no flow (Lee et al., 2017)
2.4 0.34 25 17.5 30 CuHCF/AEM/CuHCF flow-by (Kim et al., 2017)
5.6 0.25 500 400 20 NiHCF/CEM/AEM /CEM/FeHCF Nafion-coated particles, flow-by divided by membranes (Ahn et al., 2020a)
27.0 6.2 500 100 80 Ag/CEM /AgCl no flow (Ahn et al., 2020b)
13.76 0.534 50 35 30 CuHCF/AEM/CuHCF parallel flow-through (Son et al., 2020)
21.1 3.85 50 41.7 16.7 BiOCl/CEM /BiO parallel flow-through (Liu et al., 2021)
23.04 0.104 20 15 25 NiHCF/AEM /NiHCF recirculating (Pothanamkandathil et al., 2020)