Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;23(8):e24152. doi: 10.2196/24152

Table 4.

Nonrandomized trials evaluating efficacy of surgical simulators in improving surgical performance as measured by the same simulator.

Study Design (OCEBMa level) Surgical simulator Participants Simulated task Findings
Saleh (2013a) [41] Case series (4) EyeSi Eye residents (n=17) Cataract surgery EyeSi training resulted in significantly improved scores (P<.001) among residents, especially for capsulorhexis and antitremor
Gonzalez-Gonzalez (2016) [42] Case series (4) EyeSi Medical students, eye residents (n=14) Capsulorhexis EyeSi training resulted in significantly improved course scores for both dominant (33.4 vs. 46.5; P<.05) and nondominant hands (28.9 vs. 47.7; P<.001) and faster performance times (P<.001)
Bozkurt (2018) [43] Cohort (2b) EyeSi Ophthalmologists (n=16) Capsulorhexis module EyeSi training resulted in significantly improved capsulorhexis scores (P=.001)
Ropelato (2020) [44] Case series (4) Microsoft HoloLens Unspecified (n=47) Internal limiting membrane peeling There was significant improvement in micromanipulation performance scores after simulator-training

aOCEBM: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.