Table 4.
Nonrandomized trials evaluating efficacy of surgical simulators in improving surgical performance as measured by the same simulator.
Study | Design (OCEBMa level) | Surgical simulator | Participants | Simulated task | Findings |
Saleh (2013a) [41] | Case series (4) | EyeSi | Eye residents (n=17) | Cataract surgery | EyeSi training resulted in significantly improved scores (P<.001) among residents, especially for capsulorhexis and antitremor |
Gonzalez-Gonzalez (2016) [42] | Case series (4) | EyeSi | Medical students, eye residents (n=14) | Capsulorhexis | EyeSi training resulted in significantly improved course scores for both dominant (33.4 vs. 46.5; P<.05) and nondominant hands (28.9 vs. 47.7; P<.001) and faster performance times (P<.001) |
Bozkurt (2018) [43] | Cohort (2b) | EyeSi | Ophthalmologists (n=16) | Capsulorhexis module | EyeSi training resulted in significantly improved capsulorhexis scores (P=.001) |
Ropelato (2020) [44] | Case series (4) | Microsoft HoloLens | Unspecified (n=47) | Internal limiting membrane peeling | There was significant improvement in micromanipulation performance scores after simulator-training |
aOCEBM: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.