Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;40:279. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02055-w

Table 2.

Association between MET and PD-L1 expressions and clinicopathological characteristics in PDAC patients

Characteristics MET and PD-L1 MET and PD-L1 P value
low expression (N = 44) high expression (N = 49)
Gender 0.523
 Male 28 (50 %) 28 (50 %)
 Female 16 (42.1 %) 21 (57.9 %)
Age 0.432
 ≤ 60 years 14 (53.8 %) 12 (46.2 %)
 > 60 years 30 (44.8 %) 37 (55.2 %)
BMI 0.664#
 < 18.5 4 (40 %) 6 (60 %)
 18.5–23.9 31 (50.8 %) 30 (49.2 %)
 > 23.9 9 (40.9 %) 13 (59.1 %)
Tumor location status 0.127
 Head and neck 35 (52.2 %) 32 (47.8 %)
 Body and tail 9 (34.6 %) 17 (65.4 %)
Tumor size status 0.501#
 ≤ 2 cm 5 (50 %) 5 (50 %)
 2 < n ≤ 4 cm 32 (50.8 %) 31 (49.2 %)
 > 4 cm 7 (35 %) 13 (65 %)
Lymph nodes involvement 0.034
 No 21 (61.8 %) 13 (38.2 %)
 Yes 23 (39 %) 36 (61 %)
TNM stage 0.020#
 I 15 (75 %) 5 (25 %)
 II 27 (39.7 %) 41 (60.2 %)
 III-IV 2 (40 %) 3 (60 %)
Tumor differentiation 0.869#
 Well differentiated 9 (60 %) 6 (40 %)
 Moderately differentiated 18 (42.9 %) 24 (57.1 %)
 Poorly differentiated 17 (47.2 %) 19 (52.8 %)
CA199 0.575
 ≤ 37 7 (41.2 %) 10 (58.8 %)
 > 37 37 (48.7 %) 39 (51.3 %)
CA125 0.597
 ≤ 35 33 (45.8 %) 39 (54.2 %)
 > 35 11 (52.4 %) 10 (47.6 %)
CEA 0.196
 ≤ 5 30 (52.6 %) 27 (47.4 %)
 > 5 14 (38.9 %) 22 (61.1 %)

Data are presented as numbers and percentages (in parentheses) based on the total number of patients with tumors expressing high and low MET and PD-L1 levels. P values were determined using Chi-square tests. #, using Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.05, statistically significant