Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 20;75(3):504–511. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz246

Table 3.

Association Between Change in DNAm Age Acceleration and Change in Age-Related Performance Between 53 years and 60–64 years Conditional on Baseline Performance at 53 years

ΔGrip strength (kg) (n = 435) ΔChair rise (stands/min) (n = 418) ΔFEV1 (n = 451) ΔNumber of words recalled (n = 456) ΔTotal number of letters scanned (n = 464)
Estimate (95% CI) p-value Estimate (95% CI) p-value Estimate (95% CI) p-value Estimate (95% CI) p-value Estimate (95% CI) p-value
ΔAgeAccelHannum 0.19 (–0.07, 0.44) .15 0.03 (–0.14, 0.20) .74 0.006 (–0.007, 0.019) .34 –0.01 (–0.13, 0.11) .88 0.49 (–1.19, 2.17) .56
ΔAgeAccelHorvath –0.06 (–0.28, 0.16) .59 –0.12 (–0.27, 0.03) .12 –0.002 (–0.013, 0.008) .66 0.06 (–0.05, 0.17) .25 1.31 (–0.17, 2.79) .08
ΔAgeAccelPheno 0.03 (–0.14, 0.20) .72 –0.12 (–0.24, –0.01) .04 0.006 (–0.003, 0.015) .17 0.05 (–0.04, 0.13) .25 0.16 (–0.98, 1.31) .78
ΔAgeAccelGrim –0.04 (–0.18, 0.11) .60 –0.06 (–0.16, 0.04) .23 0.006 (–0.001, 0.013) .09 0.04 (–0.03, 0.11) .27 –0.91 (–1.87, 0.05) .06