Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Elast. 2021 Jan 21;145(1-2):49–75. doi: 10.1007/s10659-020-09809-1

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schema of finite deformations associated with growth and remodeling (G&R) of a soft tissue in maturity using a constrained mixture model. Individual constituents α = 1,2, …, N are assumed to be deposited within extant matrix at preferred deposition stretches Gα(τ) at G&R time τ ∈ [0, s], each relative to individual evolving natural (stress-free) configurations κnα(τ). Thereafter, these constituents may deform further because they are constrained to move with the tissue, the in vivo configuration of which evolves from κ(τ) at time τ to κ(s) at time s. Note that the reference configuration κ(0) for the tissue need not be stress-free or traction-free; indeed an in vivo configuration such as that near mean arterial pressure is often convenient in vascular mechanics. Finally, it is the constituent-specific deformation Fn(τ)α(s)=F(s)F1(τ)Gα(τ) that is most important because the associated constituent-specific stored energy function depends on this deformation alone. Of course, at the time of deposition, Fn(τ)α(τ)Gα(τ).