Table 2.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern among Enterobacteriaceae
| Organism | PIT | CPM | IMP | CL | AK | GEN | CIP | LE | CTR | CFS | CAT | NET |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=5) | 100% | 80% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 75% | - | 0% | - |
| Escherichia coli (n=1) | 100% | 0% | 100% | - | - | 100% | - | 0% | 0% | - | 100% | - |
| Citrobacter koseri (n=1) | 100% | 100% | 0% | - | - | 100% | - | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - |
| Proteus mirabilis (n=5) | 100% | 100% | 100% | IR* | - | 100% | 50% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 100% | - |
| Morganella morganii (n=1) | 100% | - | 100% | IR* | - | 100% | - | 100% | - | - | 100% | 100% |
IR* – Intrinsic resistance, CTR – ceftriaxone, NET – netilmicin, CFS- cefoperazone sulbactam