Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 May 25;111(2):337–359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.110

Table 1.

Dosimetric analyses of proton therapy for regional nodal irradiation (RNI).

Author Technique Laterality Target Heart Lung Contralateral Breast

Ares (27) 3D
1M
IP
Left (n=20) WB (n=10) CW (n=10) Metric (% Rx Dose) 3D IM IP Metric (% Rx Dose) 3D IM IP Metric (% Rx Dose) 3D IM IP Metric (%Rx Dose) 3D IM IP
Max 121* 112 109 Mean 19 19 4 L Mean 41 26 14 Max 15–84 42 12
Mean 102 101 101 V22.5 11 8 8 LV20 39 21 15 Mean 3 10 0
Min 94 93 98 V5 40 68 12 LV5 76 80 28
D95 94 93 98 R Mean 3(CW) 55 (WB) 13 1
V95 95 2 100 R V20 0 1 1
VI07 17 2 1 RV5 1 63 1
Hernandez VM Left (n=8) Metric (%Rx VM PP IP Metric (%Rx VM PP IP Metric VM PP IP Metric VM PP IP
(28) PP
IP
Dose) Dose) (%Rx Dose) (%Rx Dose)
D95 (Gy) 47.8 48.6# 49.4 V5 88 2.02 3.05 V5 53.2 13.1 19.0 V5 57 0.99 2.1
V107 0.2 0.1 0.003 V22.5 12 0.49 0.56 V20 14.7 8.73 8.72 Mean 7.3 0.17 0.34
DHI 0.13 0.09 0.58
Cl 0.72 0.81 0.86
Jimenez P/E Left CW Metric (%Rx P/E WT IP Metric (%Rx P/E WT IP Metric ( c/( Rx P/E WT IP
(31) WT (n=5) Dose) Dose) Dose)
IP Right CW Mean to PTV 99 100 100 LV5 26.6 19.7 2.8 LV5 53.6 49.2 14.9
(n=5) Max 133 120 115 L V10 15.8 16.2 1.0 L V10 43.6 42.2 9.5
D2 124 116 114 L V20 R V5 R V10 RV20 7.8
11.5
4.6
1.2
13.6
1.2
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
LV20
RV5
RV10
RV20
31.9
65.1
52
36.4
36.7
44.6
38.3
4.3
13.5
8.6
4.1
MacDonald P/E Left CW (n=l 1 ) Metric (%Rx P/E WT PP Metric P/E WT
(32) WT
PP
Dose) (%Rx
Dose)
PP Metric (%Rx P/E WT PP
Dose)
V90 92 94 99 V5 35.6 20.9
4.1 L V5 46.3 33.2 25.2 V95 89 91 98
VI0 22.7 14.9 2.8 L VI0 32.2 28.5 21.3
V20 12.4 12 1.6 LV20 21.7 25.3 16.2
V45 2.2 6.9 0.3
Ranger WT-DIBH Left Metric (%Rx WT VM IP Metric (Gy) WT VM IP Metric ( Gy) WT VM IP Metric WT VM IP
(24) VMAT-DIBH WB I)ose) (Gy)
IMPT-FB (n=10)
CW
(n=4)
PTV 85 96 100 Mean
V17Gy (%) L AD Max
2.5
2
38.3
2.6
1.8
36.2
1.0
1.3
17.4
V17Gy (%) Mean 28
0.8
28
0.7
17
0.2
Mean 1.4 1.5 0.2
Flejmer 3D-DIBH Left WB Metric 3D UP IP Metric 3D UP IP Metric 3D UP IP
(29) UP-DIBH or CW PTV Mean (Gy) 50.1 50.« 50.0 Mean (Gy) 2.1 0.2 0.2 L Mean (Gy) 12.3 7.3 6.9
IP-DIBH (n=10) PTV V95 (%) 93.9 97.1 99.0 D2% (Gy) 16.7 3.2 3.2 LD2% 46.9 32.9 33.6
PTV V105 (%) 5.0 0.1 0.1 V20 ( % ) 1.6 0 0.1 L V20(%) 23.3 13.1 11.3
PTV D98 ( % ) 46.7 47.0 48.2 V5 (%) 4.9 1.3 1.3 L V10(%) 30.1 28.8 26.8
PTV 1)2% (Gy) 52.8 51.4 51.2 LAD Mean
(Gy)
14.6 3.2 3.3 Integral Dose (Gy) 114.1 67.0 67.0
HI 12.3 8.8 6.0 LAD D2%
(Gy)
29.9 10.2 10.3
Fagundes 3D Left CW Metric 3D VM IP Metric 3D VM IP Metric 3D VM IP Metric 3D VM IP
(30) VM (n=10) PTV V100(%) 69.2 85.8 81.9 Mean (Gy) 6.8 8.2 1.2 L V20 (%) 40.4 27.3 28.4 V5 (%) 0.5 19.7 3.8
IP PTV V95 (%) 86.5 95.6 91.6 V25 (%)’ 6.3 7.4 1.2 L V10 (%) 53.3 40.6 35.9 Mean 0.5 3.8 (Gy) 0.6
PTV V90(%) 92.2 98.4 95.8 LAD Mean
(Gy)
20.9 15.5 7.0 L V5 (%) 66.4 58 41.3

Abbreviations: VM = volumctric nnxiulatcd arc therapy: PP = passively scattered proton therapy: WT = 3D conformai wide tangents: IM = intensity modulated radiation therapy: IP = intensity modulated proton therapy: UP = single field uniform proton therapy: WB = whole breast; CW = chest wall, 3D-CRT = 3D conformai radiotherapy: DH1 = dose homogeneity index: Cl = conformity index; DIBH = deep inspiratory breast hold: Gy = Gray (Relative Biological Effectiveness [RBE]); LAD = left anterior descending artery.

*

When a range was given, the average value is shown.

#

Bolded and italicized values have an associated p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference versus the comparative group, when these data were available.